Warner Bros. is diving back into Tolkien’s world with new films on the horizon, including ‘The Hunt for Gollum’ set for 2026 and another mysterious project. Let’s break down everything we know so far.
Middle-earth fans, buckle up—Warner Bros. is officially expanding Tolkien’s cinematic universe once again. Following the recent announcement, Warner Bros. has confirmed the development of new Lord of the Rings films, with Peter Jackson and Andy Serkis both heavily involved. According to Nerdist, the films aim to bring more depth to the Tolkien universe while staying true to the cinematic quality that fans have come to expect. And there’s a big surprise that could bring Ian McKellen back to don the iconic grey robes of Gandalf. Let’s take a deep dive into everything we know so far.
A New Adventure: “The Hunt for Gollum”
Warner Bros. is moving forward with new Lord of the Rings movies, kicking off with “The Hunt for Gollum.” This upcoming film is produced by Peter Jackson and directed by Andy Serkis—yes, the very man who brought Gollum to life in the original trilogy. According to Variety, the movie will expand on Gollum’s story in new ways. Contrary to previous rumors, this project won’t be split into two parts. Instead, it will be a standalone film that focuses solely on Gollum’s untold story. Instead, it will be a standalone film that focuses on Gollum’s untold story.
According to Empire, the film is set to be released in 2026, and production is actively progressing to meet that timeline (Empire). In addition to Serkis’ directorial role, it seems that the core Jackson team (including Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens) will be on board in producing capacities, which suggests an effort to keep the spirit of the original films alive while exploring new facets of the Tolkien mythos.
Ian McKellen’s Possible Return as Gandalf
Perhaps the biggest news for longtime fans is that Ian McKellen might be returning as Gandalf. Speaking to The Big Issue, McKellen revealed that he’d been contacted about reprising the role of Gandalf. Although he hasn’t received a script yet, he remains hopeful:
“I’ve just been told there are going to be more films and Gandalf will be involved, and they hope that I’ll be playing him. When? I don’t know. What the script is? It’s not written yet. So they better be quick!” (Empire)
This aligns with recent reporting from Variety, which notes that McKellen’s return is still in discussion stages. His involvement would certainly add a comforting layer of nostalgia to the film, particularly for those who have been following the franchise since The Fellowship of the Ring in 2001. For now, his return seems dependent on timing and a finalized script, but fans can certainly hope to see the beloved wizard in action once more.
Separating from Amazon’s Middle-earth
It’s important to note that these new films are entirely separate from Amazon’s ongoing “The Rings of Power” series, which explores events of the Second Age. While Amazon has focused on the rise of Sauron and the forging of the rings, Warner Bros.’ new film is expected to delve deeper into the stories surrounding Gollum, potentially elaborating on his life beyond the glimpses we have seen in the original trilogy.
Empire also mentioned that in addition to “The Hunt for Gollum,” Warner Bros. and Peter Jackson are planning more films that will explore untold stories from Tolkien’s universe. Importantly, this upcoming project is not related to Gollum but will be a completely separate film focused on new narratives within Tolkien’s world. According to Variety, Jackson has expressed a desire to dig into lesser-known parts of Tolkien’s world, potentially bringing new characters and storylines to the forefront. These could be entirely new narratives that haven’t been brought to the big screen before, or even tales that pick up after Frodo’s journey (Empire). According to Variety, Jackson has expressed a desire to dig into lesser-known parts of Tolkien’s world, potentially bringing new characters and storylines to the forefront. This could mean entirely new narratives that haven’t been brought to the big screen before, or even tales that pick up after Frodo’s journey (Empire)..
Philippa Boyens Teases Intense Gollum Story
Screenwriter Philippa Boyens recently provided insights into what audiences can anticipate from “The Hunt for Gollum”:
“It’s quite an intense story, which falls after the birthday party of Bilbo and before the Mines of Moria. It’s a specific chunk of incredible untold story, told through the perspective of this incredible creature.” (posted by @FellowshipFans via @empiremagazine on x.com on October 18, 2024)
A Glimpse of What’s to Come
Alongside “The Hunt for Gollum,” there is also the upcoming Jackson-affiliated anime film “The War of the Rohirrim”, which is set to release in late 2024. This project will take audiences into the history of Rohan and its battle-worn people, further broadening the scope of Tolkien’s world. With Warner Bros. revisiting Tolkien’s world across multiple projects, it’s an exciting time for any fan of Middle-earth.
Let’s Keep the Conversation Going
What are your thoughts on the new Lord of the Rings projects? Are you excited to see Andy Serkis step behind the camera and potentially Ian McKellen back as Gandalf? Drop your thoughts below or find me on social media—let’s keep the conversation alive as we prepare for a return to Middle-earth.
Disclaimer: This is a developing story, and details are subject to change as more official information comes in.
The launch of ‘Dustborn’ has been anything but smooth. The game’s developers recently opened up about the unexpected challenges, which have left both fans and the team at a loss. Here’s an in-depth look at what went wrong and why.
It’s been a tough time for Red Thread Games, the studio behind Dustborn. What was meant to be an exciting new entry in the gaming world ended up catching the team off guard with a reception that was, to put it lightly, brutal.
Dustborn was anticipated as a narrative-driven action-adventure game that tackled big themes like prejudice, belonging, and freedom of expression. But it seems that lofty ambitions don’t always translate to stellar gameplay—or fan approval.
To be honest, the whole concept behind Dustborn seems poorly conceived. I mean, government money funded this? Really? The game received funding from the Norwegian Film Institute (NFI) and Viken Filmsenter, both of which are state-supported entities aimed at fostering creativity in Norway.
It’s shocking, given the game’s flaws, that taxpayer money ended up supporting something that many players see as an “activist simulator” rather than a well-rounded gaming experience. (Norwegian Film Institute)
A Launch That Left Everyone Stunned
Ragnar Tørnquist, CEO of Dustborn developer Red Thread Games and the game’s director, offered his thoughts on players’ rejection of his studio’s latest game during a recent interview given to Mikkjell Lønning, the Editor-in-Chief of the Norway-based video game news outlet Gamer.no, on the subject of the Dustborn backlash.
“He stated, ‘It caught us completely off guard. We were very surprised by the extreme reaction to the launch, and we had no plan for how to handle it.’ The development team had been genuinely passionate about Dustborn, with a vision that included deep storytelling and an emotionally engaging experience. But, despite their dedication, it seems players weren’t as enamored with the final product.
The primary complaints from players have been the game’s technical problems, lackluster gameplay mechanics, and a narrative that, ironically, many found less engaging than expected.
According to Bounding Into Comics, Tørnquist seemed unwilling to acknowledge the game’s failure.
They stated, ‘We don’t feel we’ve made a game that’s primarily about politics,’ even as players criticized the overtly preachy and activist tone of the game (Bounding Into Comics.)
The stubborn attitude only fueled more backlash, as it appeared that the development team was unwilling to engage honestly with the criticisms levied against them.
Cringeworthy Mechanics and Player Reaction
To make matters worse, some of the mechanics in Dustborn are, quite frankly, laughable. According to Niche Gamer, the game’s developers responded to negative criticism specifically surrounding these mechanics, particularly the ‘Cancel’ and ‘Triggered’ features, which were received poorly by the gaming community (Niche Gamer.)
The game features characters who can “Cancel” other characters and trigger reactions akin to being “Triggered.” Players and critics alike found these features cringeworthy and pandering, with many comments highlighting that it felt like the developers were trying too hard to be relevant.
The idea of gamifying cancel culture didn’t land well, leading to a backlash that made it hard for players to take the narrative seriously. TigerDroppings, a popular gaming forum, even went so far as to call it ‘the worst game in existence,’ highlighting the community’s disdain for the forced social commentary and unengaging mechanics. (TigerDroppings)
Sales Figures Tell a Similar Story
Sales figures tell a similar story. According to reports, Dustborn grossed only around $92,969, which after fees, refunds, and Steam’s cut, left the developers with about $27,425. The game peaked at just 83 concurrent players on Steam, which is remarkably low for a game that was meant to make a big impact. (PC Gamer, Eurogamer)
The Curse of High Expectations
Part of what made Dustborn’s failure so surprising was the hype surrounding it. The trailers were promising, and many players expected a journey that would echo the emotional depth of games like Life Is Strange or Oxenfree.
Instead, early players reported performance issues, confusing combat mechanics, and story beats that didn’t land as powerfully as intended.
The gaming community on platforms like Reddit was quick to voice its disappointment. Many of the negative reviews emphasized how the game’s big themes ended up feeling forced, and how the lack of gameplay fluidity took away from the overall experience.
It’s the classic case of a game not living up to its trailers—and unfortunately, when expectations are high, the fall can be even harder.
Developer Reflection and Future Plans
Tørnquist and the rest of the development team have expressed a desire to learn from this experience, but their comments haven’t inspired much confidence among players.
During the interview, Tørnquist also spoke about an alleged wave of harassment and death threats he and his team had received from critics, admitting to Lønning, ‘You can easily ignore what’s said on forums or on X. Emails feel a little closer to home, but receiving text messages where someone wishes you dead, is unsettling.’
Statements like, ‘We don’t feel we’ve made a game that’s primarily about politics,’ from Ragnar Tørnquist, show a disconnect with what players see in the game.
The lack of acknowledgment regarding the game’s shortcomings suggests an unwillingness to fully learn from their mistakes. They’re taking player feedback to heart, aiming to improve Dustborn with post-launch updates that could salvage some of the game’s potential.
Whether or not the game can be redeemed remains to be seen, but it’s clear that Red Thread is not giving up just yet.
Explain It to Me Like I’m Five
Red Thread Games: A video game studio that created Dustborn.
Dustborn: A game about friendship, struggles, and fitting in, which was supposed to have an engaging story but ended up with lots of bugs and issues.
Norwegian Film Institute (NFI): The government entity that helped fund Dustborn.
Cancel and Triggered Mechanics: Features that let characters “Cancel” others or get “Triggered,” which players found cringeworthy and forced.
Sales Figures: Dustborn only made $92,969 in gross sales and had very few players, which was far below expectations.
The developers worked really hard and showed some cool previews that got everyone excited. But when the game finally came out, it had lots of bugs and didn’t feel as fun as people expected. Now, the people who made it are trying to fix it, but a lot of players already feel let down.
Final Thoughts
Yikes. Honestly, Dustborn is beyond parody at this point. The fact that government money went into what feels like an “activist simulator” blows my mind. And those “Cancel” and “Triggered” mechanics? Come on. Gamifying cancel culture and expecting it to resonate with players just shows a complete misunderstanding of what gamers actually want.
Have you played Dustborn yet? What are your thoughts on its rocky start, and do you think Red Thread Games can turn things around? Drop your thoughts in the comments below or join us on social media to share your experiences.
Disclaimer: This article reflects the current state of the game and the developer’s public comments as of the time of writing.
A recent surge in failing Wii U consoles has sparked concern in the retro gaming community. This article explores the chipset quality differences in Wii U models, why some are more prone to failure, and how you might be able to save your console.
If you’ve spent any time in retro gaming circles lately, you might’ve come across discussions about the sudden spike in broken Wii U consoles. A Twitter/X thread from @RetroBlastUS (posted October 18, 2024) has brought to light a concerning issue with the internal chips used in the Wii U—and it’s got a lot of people scrambling to check their consoles. Let’s dig into what’s going on and why some models might be on borrowed time.
The Chipset Lottery
According to Retro Blast, the Wii U used three different manufacturers for its internal chips: Toshiba, Samsung, and Hynix. This variation makes owning a Wii U something of a lottery. Not all chips were created equal—particularly the Hynix ones, which are reportedly the most prone to failure.
It turns out the BLACK Wii U models are most likely to have these troublesome Hynix chips, meaning their longevity is questionable at best. If you own one of these, you might want to look into accessing the BIOS menu or even opening up the console to find out what’s inside. Otherwise, it’s like having Schrödinger’s console—you don’t know if it’s about to give up until it already has.
Tweet Quote from RetroBlastUS:“The internal chips the Wii U used were manufactured by either Toshiba, Samsung or Hynix. It’s essentially a lottery, but from what I read the BLACK WiiU suffers from the worst chipsets.” (posted by @RetroBlastUS on Twitter/X, October 18, 2024)
WiiUs are LITERALLY DYING. Before you read further, Plug it in right now! DON'T let it sit without power for too long or you risk it dying for good from memory corruption. It happened to mine.
Posting this thread again for anyone who owns a WiiU and wants to keep it working 🧵 pic.twitter.com/9h8GqRzBeZ
The internal chips the WiiU used were manufactured by either Toshiba, Samsung or Hynix. It's essentially a lottery, but from what I read the BLACK WiiU suffers from the worst chipsets. You can open it up to look, or access a Bios menu to check. Hynix is the most prone to failure pic.twitter.com/ovYH4eyYjY
Retro Blast also shared that the original White Wii U model seems to be more reliable compared to the black variant. These consoles used more robust components, meaning they’ve had fewer problems reported.
But with Nintendo reportedly cutting corners on subsequent models, the lifespan of more recent Wii U consoles seems to be shorter compared to the original release.
The issue raises an important point about console quality and durability. Modern systems are far more advanced in terms of hardware and features, but it seems like older systems—think N64 or even the GameCube—are often better built for longevity.
It’s ironic that a system from 2012 might be more fragile than one from 1996, but that seems to be the direction we’re heading in with console design.
Tweet Quote from RetroBlastUS:“The original White WiiU model is usually the most solid. Nintendo cut corners on future models and they are more likely to die on you.” (posted by @RetroBlastUS on Twitter/X, October 18, 2024)
A Ticking Time Bomb
In Retro Blast’s words, the Wii U is “a ticking time bomb.” While it was a unique console that offered Wii compatibility and HDMI support, not to mention its library of great games, the limitations of modern components might be setting us up for a future where newer consoles simply don’t have the same staying power as their predecessors.
Retro Blast’s post clearly highlights that while we love these consoles, we need to acknowledge that they’re becoming increasingly difficult to preserve.
To verify these claims, I checked additional sources. Reports from retro gaming forums such as Reddit and specialized hardware review websites corroborate the issues with the Hynix chips, with many users confirming that the black Wii U units tend to fail more often. Nintendo Life also discussed the disparities in quality between earlier and later Wii U models.
In a recent article, Nintendo Life highlighted that “users have noticed frequent failures in consoles using certain chips, with Hynix being particularly problematic.” (Reddit discussion on Hynix chip issues) Additionally, a discussion on ResetEra pointed to similar reports from various users, further backing up the claims that black units are more prone to hardware failure. (TechPowerUp)
Furthermore, Voultar, a well-known hardware modder, has spoken about the failing chips and potential fixes, suggesting that “the hardware variances do indeed contribute to different failure rates across units.” (Voultar’s Blog)
These testimonies indicate that the concerns are not just anecdotal but part of a growing trend among retro gaming enthusiasts.
Options for Fixing the Issue
So, what can you do if you’re facing this issue? Retro Blast mentioned a potential fix called NAND-Aid, which could potentially bring a failing Wii U back to life.
They gave a shoutout to @Voultar for his work on this, providing a link for anyone interested in trying it out. However, even with fixes like this, it’s clear that console preservation isn’t getting any easier. The days of consoles lasting decades might be over, and as Retro Blast pointed out, it’s us gamers who will pay the price for cut corners.
Tweet Quote from RetroBlastUS:“There is another fix called NAND-Aid that you can try if this happens to you. I want to again thank @voultar for his work on this because it could help a lot of people.” (posted by @RetroBlastUS on Twitter/X, October 18, 2024)
FYI: There is another fix called NAND-Aid that you can try if this happens to you. I want to again thank @voultar for his work on this because it could help a lot of people. Link below for anyone interested in trying it.https://t.co/4ibVrHxZfw
Basically, the Wii U is a video game console that’s getting older, and some of its parts aren’t holding up well. Depending on which company made the internal chips, some Wii U consoles are more likely to break.
The black versions of the Wii U might have these weaker parts, while the white ones seem to be a bit safer. If your Wii U breaks, there are fixes out there, but it’s not always easy.
It’s a bit like having an old car—sometimes it runs perfectly, and sometimes you need a lot of repairs.
Let’s Keep the Conversation Going
Are you one of the lucky Wii U owners, or have you found your console on the fritz? Let’s hear your thoughts and experiences. Drop a comment below, or hit us up on social media to share your story. Have you tried any of these fixes, or are you as nervous about your Wii U’s future as we are?
Disclaimer: This article is based on information shared through publicly available social media posts and does not reflect the opinions of this publication.
The Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) celebrates its 39th anniversary today, marking nearly four decades since it revolutionized the gaming world. Learn about its impact on the industry, the iconic games it introduced, and why it remains a cultural touchstone.
Happy 39th birthday to the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES)! Today, we celebrate the legacy of that little grey box that changed gaming forever when it launched on October 18, 1985, alongside legendary titles like Super Mario Bros. And while we’re talking about iconic moments, I have to mention my own less-than-glorious introduction to the NES. My first game was Friday the 13th by LJN—a game that was almost impossible to love. If you remember it, you probably know what I mean. But hey, we all have our origins, right?
A Look Back at the NES
Released on October 18, 1985, the NES became a household name, especially in North America, where it helped revive the gaming industry after the infamous video game crash of 1983. It was a defining moment—the NES wasn’t just a console; it was the resurrection of gaming. And while not every game was a classic (looking at you, Friday the 13th), it brought with it legends like The Legend of Zelda, Metroid, and Mega Man that defined genres and gave us countless reasons to keep coming back. It wasn’t just about the hardware—it was the iconic games, the unforgettable music, and the pure joy of side-scrolling adventures that brought the NES to life. Titles like The Legend of Zelda, Metroid, Mega Man, and Castlevania each carved their own niche into the history of gaming, defining genres and establishing fan bases that thrive even today.
The Console that Defined a Generation
For many of us, the NES was our first taste of video games. I mean, the simplicity of the two-button controller gave way to games that were anything but simple. Whether you were battling Bowser to save Princess Peach, fighting off aliens with Samus Aran, or struggling to survive against Jason Voorhees in Friday the 13th (seriously, that game was a nightmare), the NES knew how to leave an impression.
The NES introduced countless children to the joy of gaming, and its influence reached beyond its era. From launching the careers of legendary developers like Shigeru Miyamoto to setting the template for platformers and RPGs, the NES laid the groundwork for the industry we know today.
Nostalgia Reigns Supreme
Fans are reminiscing today, sharing stories and memories of what the NES meant to them. Twitter/X user @16bitnostalgia captured the moment perfectly, tweeting:
Happy 39th birthday to the NES!
39 years ago, this little grey box made its way into our homes and into our hearts along with Super Mario Bros and changed the face of gaming forever!
Other users chimed in with their favorite memories:
@ItsMoneyMiller asked: “What was your favorite NES game? Also; What was the best Mario?” (posted on Twitter/X on October 18, 2024)
@JWthib responded with the famous Konami Code: “up, up, down, down…” (posted on Twitter/X on October 18, 2024)
@GaryW_Rodgers shared a nostalgic sentiment: “Wow, 39 years…” (posted on Twitter/X on October 18, 2024)
@DJDanzadotcom mentioned: “The Goonies 2!” (posted on Twitter/X on October 18, 2024)
@Cryptocrazy589 added: “Metroid” (posted on Twitter/X on October 18, 2024)
@Lowherz9 simply said: “Goes hard” (posted on Twitter/X on October 18, 2024)
@thecheesyboy reminisced about playing Duck Hunt and Super Mario Bros in a demo machine: “My only real memories are of playing Duck Hunt and SMB in Dixon’s on the demo machine. Usually, it was on something like a 2-minute reset loop, but occasionally that was turned off.” (posted on Twitter/X on October 18, 2024)
@TheModelGamerYT shared a fond memory with their father: “I remember my father picking me up from daycare and my NES Action Set sitting in the back seat. It was a huge moment.” (posted on Twitter/X on October 18, 2024)
@Valdain listed a top 5: “1. First games Zelda/Super Mario. 2. First Other RPG’s: Final Fantasy/Dragon Warrior. 3. Action games: Metroid, Ninja Gaiden and Contra. 4. Sports games: Original Baseball/Tecmo Bowl. 5. Other Games: Super Mario 3 and Punch Out.” (posted on Twitter/X on October 18, 2024)
@JamesBu43811238 recalled playing Super Mario 3 non-stop with their cousin: “Super Mario 3. I have the fondest memories of this one because my cousin and I played it non–stop for what seems like forever.” (posted on Twitter/X on October 18, 2024)
@ChrisCeleste1 shared how renting Battletoads turned mundane games into fun: “Super Mario Bros 3, Blades of Steel, always renting Battletoads to try to beat the game (which I never did), having the Game Genie turned mundane games into a fun romp.” (posted on Twitter/X on October 18, 2024)
NES and Its Impact on Gaming and Pop Culture
The NES wasn’t just a gaming console; it was a cultural phenomenon. It introduced millions to the world of video gaming and set the standard for what home entertainment could be. The NES turned video games into a mainstream hobby, and its influence extended into pop culture—from Saturday morning cartoons to breakfast cereals. Its characters, like Mario and Link, became cultural icons that transcended the gaming world, representing the joy, creativity, and adventure of a new era.
The NES’s impact wasn’t confined to its generation. It paved the way for the console wars of the ’90s, influenced the indie game movement of today, and laid the foundation for gaming as a respected and dominant entertainment medium. In short, the NES wasn’t just about games; it was about creating memories, bringing people together, and shaping the entertainment landscape in a way that still resonates today.
Explain It to Me Like I’m Five
The Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) was one of the first home video game consoles that really made gaming popular. Imagine a small grey box that you plug into your TV, and suddenly, you could control characters like Mario, a plumber who jumps on enemies and saves princesses. It came out in 1985 and became super popular because it had amazing games for its time—games that were easy to understand but hard to master. Some of the most famous NES games are Super Mario Bros, where you save Princess Peach, The Legend of Zelda, which lets you explore dungeons and fight monsters, and Metroid, where you play as a space bounty hunter named Samus. The NES helped make video games mainstream and paved the way for the gaming industry we know today.
Let’s Keep the Conversation Going
What’s your favorite NES memory? Did you save Princess Peach, master Contra without the Konami code, or did you struggle to defeat Dr. Wily in Mega Man? Share your best NES moments with us in the comments, or find us on social media. Let’s celebrate this piece of gaming history together!
Hollywood is losing its collective mind over the prospect of Donald Trump securing a second term in office. And honestly, it feels like we’re watching the same reel of hysteria play out again, just with updated special effects.
According to a recent piece from Variety, the industry’s reaction ranges from alarmed to borderline apocalyptic, touching on fears about taxes, tariffs, and freedom of speech. Sound familiar? Yep, we’ve been here before.
How Trump Affected Hollywood During His First Term
During Trump’s first term, Hollywood had a very vocal response—every late-night monologue seemed to transform into an anti-Trump platform, awards shows became stages for political speeches, and numerous films and TV shows included jabs at Trump’s policies.
According to The Hollywood Reporter, many studios and creators felt compelled to use their platforms to counter what they viewed as an attack on democracy and civil rights. However, some of these efforts did not resonate with all audiences, leading to mixed receptions at the box office and accusations of “preaching” from viewers.
Were their concerns valid? On one hand, Trump’s policies on immigration, LGBTQ+ rights, and other social issues directly impacted many within the creative community.
On the other hand, Hollywood’s heavy-handed political messaging was seen by some as alienating segments of their audience, and not necessarily effective in changing minds or policies. This tension remains as Hollywood braces for the potential of another Trump term.
Trump Derangement Syndrome
Remember “Trump Derangement Syndrome”? No, it’s not a medical diagnosis, but it might as well have been, given how the media and entertainment world responded to his first term. The term itself was coined by political columnist Charles Krauthammer, who originally used a similar phrase—“Bush Derangement Syndrome”—in 2003 to describe an irrational overreaction to George W. Bush.
Later, it was adapted for Trump, with Krauthammer characterizing it as a form of “general hysteria” where critics could no longer distinguish between valid policy disagreements and a more visceral disdain for Trump himself, according to Psychology Today.
Many supporters of Trump, including Trump himself, have used the term to discredit his detractors, framing their opposition as a kind of emotional overreaction rather than reasoned critique, as noted by Wikipedia.
In fact, Psychology Today points out that “Trump Derangement Syndrome” isn’t recognized by the DSM-5 (the standard reference for mental health conditions), meaning it’s not officially considered a diagnosable disorder. Instead, it’s more of a “folk category”—a label that has gained traction in public discourse but lacks medical validation. Despite its unofficial status, the term continues to be used to describe what many see as an unhinged reaction to anything involving Trump, often implying that critics are irrational or hysterical.
Celebrity Backlash
We’ve seen recent examples of this play out publicly. Wil Wheaton recently lashed out at Zachary Levi on social media over Levi’s endorsement of Trump, calling him out in a Facebook post:
“Something I love about our nerd community is how welcoming and diverse we are. We are a safe place for everyone who has ever been Othered. We are a safe place for vulnerable people to come together and safely love all the wonderful nerdy stuff we love. With that in mind, I think it’s pretty important for anyone who supports Nerd HQ knows who and what they are supporting. What a disappointment. What a disgrace. How disgusting.”
Wheaton went on to emphasize that safe spaces cannot exist if those who make others feel unsafe are allowed to be a part of them, referencing the “Paradox of Tolerance,” according to reports from Bounding Into Comics and Bleeding Cool. It’s a classic example of how celebrities can be pressured into toeing a specific line, with any deviation sparking backlash and public shaming.
Mark Hamill, well-known for his iconic role as Luke Skywalker, has used his social media platforms to regularly criticize Trump, often combining humor with his political commentary. His tweets frequently target Trump’s statements and policies, with many going viral and garnering widespread media attention. Publications like The Hollywood Reporter and Rolling Stone have covered Hamill’s persistent social media activity, which has made anti-Trump commentary a significant part of his public image.
Similarly, George Takei, known for his role in Star Trek, has also made his disdain for Trump a cornerstone of his social media persona. Takei frequently ties his criticisms to his advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights and immigration issues, highlighting how Trump’s policies negatively affect these communities. His outspoken stance has been featured in outlets like NBC News and Variety, making anti-Trump sentiment a key part of his public platform.
Mac Miller made his strong distaste for Trump known during an appearance on The Nightly Show, where he unleashed a scathing critique of Trump, calling him a “racist son of a b****” and a “psychopathic power-hungry” individual (Entertainment Weekly).
Sarah Silverman took her disdain to comedic extremes by dressing as Adolf Hitler on Conan to mock Trump, highlighting the absurdity of his statements (Rolling Stone).
Kerry Washington criticized Trump as perpetuating fear and hate, specifically noting his campaign tactics and the spin involved (Entertainment Weekly).
Robert De Niro has consistently spoken out against Trump, famously calling him “totally nuts” and unfit to hold office (HuffPost).
Will Smith criticized Trump’s derogatory comments, emphasizing how unacceptable such behavior was, especially when it was cheered on by audiences (News.com.au).
Chrissy Teigen has taken numerous swipes at Trump over the years, expressing her disdain on platforms like Twitter (Entertainment Weekly).
The Case of Gina Carano
Gina Carano has faced significant backlash for her political views, resulting in her being effectively blacklisted from major roles. Carano, who openly shared her conservative perspectives, was ousted from her role on The Mandalorian after her social media posts were deemed controversial, sparking significant backlash from both the industry and audiences, as detailed by Deadline. This kind of treatment sends a message loud and clear: fall in line or face the consequences.
Every late-night monologue became an anti-Trump sermon, awards shows turned into soapboxes, and even your favorite Netflix drama had to include some kind of thinly veiled jab at 45. Now, with the possibility of a second go-around, it’s like the Hollywood sirens are already warming up their vocal cords for a doomsday ballad.
Hollywood’s Overreaction vs. Genuine Concerns
The Problem of Creative Censorship
But let’s keep it real for a minute. While I think Hollywood tends to overreact in dramatic (and meme-worthy) ways, there’s still a conversation to be had about some genuine concerns. We’ve seen how polarization in the entertainment industry can not only skew public perception but also stifle creativity.
Under the guise of “protecting democracy,” we’ve seen calls for censorship and a cancel culture attitude that ironically chips away at the freedom of speech these creatives claim to uphold. Smaller productions and less mainstream voices are especially vulnerable to this climate, as they might lack the financial safety net or platform to weather such backlash. That’s where my worries kick in.
Case in point: During Trump’s first term, any celebrity who dared to express anything short of total disdain for the administration was quickly shamed into silence or, worse, blacklisted. The return of that atmosphere—a world where you have to tread lightly just to avoid social crucifixion—doesn’t exactly bode well for the creative arts.
Sure, Hollywood likes to talk a big game about resilience and resistance, but let’s not pretend the fear isn’t real, even among the industry’s biggest names.
Economic Concerns
Tariffs and Tax Policies Impact on Hollywood
And let’s talk economics—another sticking point in the Variety piece. Hollywood bigwigs are worried about potential tariffs and tax policies that might affect everything from film production to box office returns. But let’s be honest: while the headlines scream economic catastrophe, the studios are still going to crank out those blockbuster franchises.
If Marvel movies can survive a pandemic that shut down theaters worldwide, I think they can survive some potential changes in trade policy.
The bottom line? Hollywood’s alarm bells aren’t surprising—this is, after all, an industry that’s as much about spectacle off-screen as on. But maybe, just maybe, a bit more perspective this time around could help. Instead of succumbing to another round of “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” it might be more constructive to focus on adapting, finding creative solutions, and maybe even (dare I say it?) making some good art that speaks to everyone, not just the echo chamber.
Companies Turning Away from DEI and Hollywood’s Potential Reaction
Recently, some major companies have started to scale back their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives due to political pressures and changing priorities. For example, Toyota Motor Corp. announced that it would refocus its DEI efforts away from supporting LGBTQ+ events, choosing instead to focus on STEM education and workforce readiness. Similarly, companies like Ford Motor Co. and Tractor Supply Co. have been pulling back from DEI programs, citing a highly politicized environment around these initiatives.
On the flip side, a potential second Trump term could lead to Hollywood ramping up politically charged content again. During Trump’s first term, the entertainment industry often responded with more overtly political material, from late-night show monologues to storylines in television and film that offered thinly veiled critiques of his administration. If Trump were re-elected, we could expect Hollywood to double down on creating content that addresses and critiques his policies, much like they did during his previous tenure.
The withdrawal from DEI by corporations contrasts sharply with how Hollywood might react to renewed political challenges. While some companies are retreating from initiatives that support inclusivity, Hollywood could see a resurgence of politically motivated storytelling and advocacy. This divergence underscores the ongoing tension between corporate risk management and the entertainment industry’s drive to address social and political issues through its narratives.
“Explain it to Me Like I’m Five”
Hollywood is like a kid who doesn’t want a teacher (Trump) to come back, fearing strict rules and no fun.
Some kids (companies) are stepping back from being inclusive, while others (Hollywood) are planning to make a lot of noise.
There’s a competition between Kamala Harris and Trump to be “class president,” with mixed feelings from everyone.
Some fear losing creativity, others think it’s exaggerated panic. The latest polls are like everyone deciding between pizza (Harris) and tacos (Trump)—it’s close!
Let’s Keep the Conversation Going
What do you think about Hollywood’s reaction to the possibility of a second Trump term? Are they overreacting, or are their fears justified? Drop your thoughts below or find me on social media—let’s keep this conversation rolling.
Disclaimer: This is an opinion piece and does not reflect the opinions of this site or its affiliates.
Sources:
Variety: “Donald Trump’s Second Term: What It Could Mean for Hollywood’s Taxes, Tariffs, and Freedom of Speech” (2024) link
Psychology Today: “The Paradox of ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome'” (2019) link
Wikipedia: “Trump Derangement Syndrome” (2018) link
The music world is still in shock following the untimely death of Liam Payne, former member of One Direction, and now the cause of his death has been officially revealed.
According to AP News, Payne’s death was confirmed to be the result of an accidental fall from a hotel balcony. Authorities have ruled out any foul play, with initial reports indicating that Payne may have been struggling with his mental health in the days leading up to the tragic incident.
Payne’s death is yet another grim reminder of the mental health challenges that many artists face behind the scenes. He had been open about his struggles, and those close to him had expressed concern regarding his well-being. The official report has provided some closure for fans, but it also highlights the vulnerability that Payne faced.
Mental Health Awareness in the Spotlight
In the wake of Payne’s passing, conversations around mental health, particularly within the entertainment industry, have been brought into sharper focus. One Direction bandmate Harry Styles recently took to X (formerly Twitter) to share his grief and urge people to be more supportive of one another. “We lost a kind soul, and it breaks my heart that he was hurting. Let’s do better for those around us.” This sentiment has been echoed by fans and celebrities alike, who are calling for greater awareness and support systems for those struggling in the limelight.
Public Reaction to the News
Fans across the world have taken to social media to pay tribute to Payne, with hashtags like #RIPLiampayne trending globally. The outpouring of grief is a testament to his impact on fans and the broader community. Many have shared stories about how Payne’s music helped them through their own struggles, with one fan writing, “Liam’s songs were there when I felt alone. I just wish he had someone there for him.”
Newsweek reported further celebrity reactions to Liam Payne’s death, highlighting how his influence reached across the entertainment world. Public figures from all corners have shared their condolences and fond memories of Payne, underscoring the powerful connections he formed throughout his career.
Media Coverage Under Scrutiny
The media’s handling of Payne’s death, particularly the controversial publication of graphic images by TMZ, has also come under intense scrutiny. Many are questioning whether the rights to privacy of public figures are ever respected, even in death. The Hollywood Reporter criticized TMZ for their callous coverage, pointing out how insensitive it was to publish the photos so soon after Payne’s death. This incident has once again sparked the debate on responsible journalism, especially when covering the lives of those who were open about their mental health struggles.
“Explain It To Me Like I’m Five”
Who was Liam Payne? Liam Payne was a famous singer from the band One Direction. He also made his own music and was loved by many fans.
What happened to Liam? Liam had an accident where he fell from a balcony, and it was very sad. People think he was having a hard time with his feelings, and that might have led to the accident.
The Bigger Picture: Media Ethics and Responsibility
The controversy surrounding TMZ’s actions highlights a much larger issue in media culture: the balance between public interest and respect for individual privacy. Payne’s death has become a flashpoint for discussions about how far is too far when it comes to reporting on celebrities. The incident has led many to question if the public’s ‘right to know’ should outweigh the dignity of the individuals involved, especially when they are no longer alive to defend themselves.
Let’s Keep the Conversation Going
Losing Liam Payne is heartbreaking for so many, and it raises tough questions about how we support mental health, especially for public figures. What can we do better to support those around us? Let’s keep talking about this—share your thoughts below or on social media.
TMZ reported that Liam Payne, a 31-year-old singer known for being part of One Direction, had died after falling from a hotel balcony. This shocking news not only devastated Payne’s fans but also brought to light the challenges he was facing in his personal life. Payne had been candid about his struggles with mental health, and the news of his sudden death deeply resonated with many who were aware of his battles.
According to AP News, Payne’s death was confirmed by local authorities, and initial reports indicate that he may have been experiencing a mental health crisis prior to the incident. E! Online also reported that police had received a 911 call shortly before the incident, expressing concerns about Payne’s state.
Following the tragic news, TMZ published photos of Payne’s body, which were widely condemned as insensitive and exploitative. The publication of these images has reignited discussions about journalistic ethics and the responsibility media outlets hold when reporting on sensitive issues, especially concerning mental health.
Critics argue that TMZ’s actions were not only a violation of privacy but also a blatant attempt to capitalize on tragedy for profit. The graphic nature of the photos, which included close-ups of Payne’s body lying on the ground after the fall, was viewed as especially distasteful by many fans and critics, particularly given Payne’s public struggles with mental health. The Hollywood Reporter criticized TMZ for their callous coverage, noting the public and fans’ outrage over the handling of the situation.
Many fans took to social media to express their anger, with some calling for boycotts of TMZ and others demanding more stringent regulations on media coverage of sensitive events. The backlash highlighted the growing frustration with tabloid culture and its disregard for the well-being of public figures.
Payne’s team called TMZ’s actions “appalling”, adding that the content was “a gross invasion of privacy and incredibly disrespectful and harmful not only to Liam but also to others who are struggling with mental health issues.”
Twitter/X Reactions
The official One Direction Twitter account expressed their heartbreak, saying, “i’m absolutely devastated. more than devastated. liam james payne, dad of the band, outgoing, very talented, an amazing father. you mean so much to me and others. thank you for everything you’ve done for the boys, your family, and especially us fans. love you forever. #liampayne”.
Newsweek reported further celebrity reactions to Liam Payne’s death, noting how many stars shared their condolences on social media.
William Shatner also expressed his condolences on X, writing, “Condolences to the family of Liam Payne. 😞”.
Paris Hilton took to X (formerly Twitter), expressing her condolences and sending love to Payne’s family and loved ones.
“Explain It To Me Like I’m Five”
Who is Liam Payne? Liam Payne is a singer who was part of the band One Direction. He’s also a solo artist, known for his music and public appearances.
What happened with TMZ? TMZ reported that Liam Payne had died after falling from a hotel balcony and published photos of his body. They claimed it was meant to provoke thought about mortality, but many believe it was simply a stunt for attention and profit.
Why are people mad? People think it was wrong of TMZ to do this because it can hurt Liam Payne and other people who struggle with their feelings or mental health.
Let’s Keep the Conversation Going
What do you think about TMZ’s decision to publish these photos? Are they crossing a line, or is there value in pushing taboos like this? Share your thoughts in the comments or join the discussion on social media—where do we, as consumers, draw the line?
Ncuti Gatwa might have let a bit too much slip during his recent appearance on The Graham Norton Show, perhaps speaking out of turn about Doctor Who’s upcoming Season 3. His comments have sparked a frenzy among fans, and it seems the BBC is not entirely pleased. A spokesperson from the BBC stated, “As we’ve said previously, the decision on season three will be made after season two transmits and as always we don’t comment on speculation.” This cautious stance suggests that Gatwa’s remarks may have been premature, adding both excitement and a fair share of controversy.
Ncuti Gatwa may have spoken out of line, hinting at details that have left fans buzzing and the BBC maintaining a cautious stance. Ncuti Gatwa recently took to The Graham Norton Show to chat about the upcoming Season 3 of his run as the iconic Time Lord in Doctor Who. And let’s just say, the internet is buzzing. During the interview, Ncuti teased some details about the next season that have left Whovians with more questions than answers—just the way the Doctor likes it.
As noted in a Bounding Into Comics article, Gatwa is no stranger to controversial remarks. Earlier this year he faced backlash from a vocal segment of the fanbase unhappy with his casting, Gatwa responded directly to critics, telling them to ‘touch some grass.’ This reaction further divided opinion, but it certainly made headlines.
Season 3 Teasers and Speculation
While many fans expected a straightforward preview of what’s to come, what they got was a bit of a cryptic message. Ncuti hinted at some big shakeups ahead, mentioning that “this isn’t your average season, and things might get a little… tricky.” If you’re a fan of the show, you know the Doctor never says anything without layers of meaning, and Gatwa’s choice of words has left many theorizing about the potential direction of Season 3. Is the Doctor going to face an unexpected betrayal? Are we in for another twist that challenges what we thought we knew about the TARDIS and its quirky custodian?
Familiar Faces and New Villains?
According to Deadline, Gatwa’s interview contained subtle hints suggesting that this season might blur the lines between the Doctor’s various timelines in ways we’ve never seen before. Gatwa also laughed off questions about new villains, instead playfully hinting, “I can’t say much, but let’s just say I’ve met some familiar faces, and not all of them are friendly.” Cue the speculation: are classic villains making a return? Or is it a hint that we’ll see new allies-turned-enemies?
Gatwa’s Third Season: Raising the Stakes
This is Gatwa’s third season at the helm of the TARDIS, and it’s clear he’s ready to take some creative leaps with the character. The actor is already being praised for bringing an infectious energy and a fresh take on the Doctor. His portrayal is equal parts quirky, intense, and deeply emotional—qualities that are setting his era apart in Doctor Who history. And from the sounds of it, Season 3 is about to amp all of those qualities up to eleven.
Disney Collaboration and Expanded Ambitions
But here’s where things get interesting. The BBC’s cautious response to Gatwa’s comments, combined with the fact that Russell T Davies, the showrunner, has been hyping up this season as “unlike anything we’ve ever done”, means there’s probably more at stake than your average Dalek showdown. The recent partnership with Disney is also a major factor in this shift, as it has allowed the show to access greater resources, potentially leading to more ambitious storytelling and higher production value. According to a Deadline report, this collaboration aims to expand Doctor Who’s reach, bringing it to a more global audience and setting the stage for larger-scale stories that could redefine what we expect from the series. Perhaps we’re on the brink of a multi-Doctor storyline or something that fundamentally changes the rules of time travel itself. The sky (or maybe the universe?) is the limit. Perhaps we’re on the brink of a multi-Doctor storyline or something that fundamentally changes the rules of time travel itself. The sky (or maybe the universe?) is the limit.
Emotional Challenges and Companion Conflicts
The conversation didn’t stop with just teases about plotlines and villains. Ncuti also spoke about his experience working with the cast and hinted at some emotional challenges this season that tested the Doctor’s resolve. “It’s hard being the Doctor sometimes, but it’s even harder when your friends don’t see you the same way,” he mused, hinting at potential conflicts within the Doctor’s companion lineup. This one line has had fans rushing to Reddit to speculate—is there a betrayal brewing in the TARDIS crew?
What Lies Ahead for Season 3?
A spokesperson from the BBC stated, “As we’ve said previously, the decision on season three will be made after season two transmits and as always we don’t comment on speculation.” Season 2 is expected to launch next spring, leaving the fate of Season 3 uncertain for now.
Season 3 might still be a mystery in many ways, but one thing’s for sure: it sounds like Ncuti Gatwa and Russell T Davies are cooking up something very, very special for the Doctor Who universe. So Whovians, buckle up—it’s going to be a bumpy ride through time and space, and all we can do is hang on and enjoy the twists.
“Explain It To Me Like I’m Five”
Who is Ncuti Gatwa? Ncuti Gatwa is the actor currently playing the Doctor on Doctor Who. He took over the iconic role, which has been portrayed by many actors over the years, and he’s known for his energetic and emotional take on the character.
What is Doctor Who? Doctor Who is a British TV series about a Time Lord called “the Doctor” who travels through time and space in a ship called the TARDIS, which looks like a blue police box. The Doctor can regenerate, which means the character takes on a new appearance and personality, which is why the role has been played by many different actors.
What’s going on in Season 3? Ncuti Gatwa recently hinted that the upcoming season of Doctor Who will be different from past ones, possibly involving big changes in the Doctor’s relationships and storylines. Fans are excited and curious about what these changes might be.
Let’s Keep the Conversation Going
What do you think of Ncuti Gatwa’s comments about Doctor Who Season 3? Are we in for a timeline-bending twist or a classic villain comeback? Share your theories in the comments or on social media—let’s unravel the mystery together and see where the TARDIS takes us next!
It looks like the infamous Asmongold has found himself in another storm of controversy—this time leading to a Twitch ban.
The popular streamer was recently booted off the platform after making offensive remarks about Palestinian culture during a live broadcast. The backlash was swift, with viewers and critics calling out the comments as insensitive and harmful. Twitch responded by enforcing a ban, citing violations of their community guidelines around hate speech.
The incident is part of a broader conversation about the responsibility of high-profile streamers to maintain respectful conduct online.
This isn’t the first time Asmongold has been called out for controversial behavior, but the stakes seem higher now given the sensitivity of the topic and the increasing scrutiny around Twitch’s moderation policies.
Following the ban, Asmongold posted an apology on X (formerly Twitter), stating, “Looking back on it, I was way too much of an asshole about the Palestine thing. My bad. Of course no one deserves to have their life destroyed even if they do things or have views I find regressive. You guys deserve more than me saying stupid shit like that, I’ll do better.”
However, according to Dexerto, the apology was met with mixed reactions. While some followers accepted his remorse, others responded skeptically. One user commented, “You just violated your golden rule of never apologizing,” to which Asmongold replied, “I don’t mind apologizing if it’s something I think I’m actually wrong about. Given the amount of times I’ve gotten hate for things and never apologized should be proof enough of that.”
Asmongold wrote, “I realize now how harmful my words were, and I am truly sorry to those I’ve hurt. I need to do better, and I will.” Despite his statement, many argue that his history of similar incidents shows a pattern that simple apologies cannot fix.
Twitch’s Standards in Question
This latest incident also puts a spotlight on Twitch’s community standards.
Over the past few years, Twitch has tried to cultivate a more inclusive and respectful environment, but it hasn’t always been consistent. Some users argue that the platform’s enforcement policies can be unpredictable and uneven—with some high-profile creators often seeming to get a pass.
Recent events have highlighted that Twitch’s moderation practices are under constant scrutiny. For instance, Gamingbible recently reported on Amouranth being officially dethroned as the top female streamer on Twitch, which has sparked a debate about the shifting dynamics of the platform and how female creators are treated. The dethroning of Amouranth, who was previously known for pushing the boundaries of content on Twitch, also sheds light on how the platform’s policies and enforcement might differ depending on the creator’s gender and content type.
Adding further to the discussion of Twitch’s inconsistent enforcement, a Washington Post report highlighted a leaked list of “do-not-ban” streamers, which allegedly includes big names like Tyler1 and RiceGum. This revelation has fueled accusations that Twitch protects its top creators while selectively applying its rules to others. Many in the community feel that this special treatment allows some streamers to skirt repercussions for behavior that would lead to bans for less popular creators.
Many have pointed out that there seems to be a double standard when it comes to Twitch’s treatment of streamers. Female streamers, often referred to as “e-girls,” have faced swift and harsh bans for comparatively minor infractions, such as wardrobe slips or suggestive content. In contrast, some high-profile male streamers appear to receive more leniency for comments or actions that could be deemed more harmful.
At the same time, there are also arguments that female creators are not held to the same standards as their male counterparts, with some suggesting that certain content, which might be seen as inappropriate if streamed by a male, is tolerated when it comes from popular female creators. This perceived inconsistency adds fuel to the ongoing debate about fairness in Twitch’s enforcement policies.
This discrepancy has led to frustration within the community, with some arguing that Twitch is more willing to protect their most profitable creators—usually male—while holding female creators to either stricter or different standards. This criticism has been echoed in incidents involving popular streamers like Pokimane and Alinity, who have faced bans for content that, according to critics, wouldn’t have warranted such action if it had come from a male streamer.
Asmongold’s ban could serve as a litmus test for how Twitch handles major infractions moving forward and whether they can apply their standards more consistently across different types of creators, regardless of their profile or perceived profitability.
According to GameRant, Asmongold’s situation could have far-reaching consequences for the streaming community. Some commentators believe this ban might serve as a turning point, forcing Twitch to adopt more transparent and consistent moderation practices, especially when dealing with prominent creators.
Asmongold’s popularity complicates the issue, as many fans are voicing their discontent with Twitch’s decision, while others are calling for more accountability from content creators with significant influence.
Community Reactions: Divided Opinions
As reported by Dexerto, the community remains deeply divided over the ban.
A significant number of viewers took to social media to voice their dissatisfaction with Twitch’s action, with some stating that Asmongold’s remarks were taken out of context and that he deserves a chance to learn from his mistake.
Adding to the discussion, Niche Gamer reported that Asmongold’s comments were not just offensive but also deeply rooted in harmful stereotypes, which many argue cross the line from inappropriate humor to outright hate speech.
A spokesperson for Twitch, according to Niche Gamer, stated, “Twitch is committed to maintaining a safe and inclusive community for all users. Actions that promote hate or discrimination will not be tolerated, regardless of the creator’s status.”
This statement reflects Twitch’s attempt to align their public messaging with stricter moderation policies, though whether they will follow through consistently is still up for debate.
A related incident involved Asmongold’s outspoken criticism of Hogwarts Legacy boycotters, which led to a wave of backlash against him, as reported by Bounding Into Comics. Asmongold’s comments on those attempting to boycott the game due to its association with J.K. Rowling were met with hostility from activists, further fueling debates around the responsibilities of content creators when engaging with controversial topics.
Another perspective comes from Dr Disrespect’s move to YouTube, covered by Indy100. His shift away from Twitch following a mysterious ban did not diminish his popularity—in fact, it seems to have made his presence stronger on another platform. This has led some in the community to question whether high-profile streamers even need Twitch to thrive and whether similar opportunities could be available for others like Asmongold if they decide or are forced to leave Twitch.
While some fans have come out in support of Asmongold, arguing that his comments were taken out of context or that he deserves a second chance, others have expressed concern that leniency towards big-name streamers perpetuates a harmful double standard.
If Twitch is serious about creating a welcoming and safe environment, then enforcing rules equally across the board is crucial.
Twitch’s Balancing Act
Twitch is caught between two major forces: the need to enforce its rules fairly and the commercial value of keeping popular creators like Asmongold on the platform.
This dilemma has been further compounded by the recent wave of Twitch layoffs, which reflects a broader contraction within the gaming industry, as reported by Bold Business. According to the report, Twitch’s reliance on its star creators to drive profit is increasingly crucial as the platform navigates financial pressures and industry shifts. These layoffs have sparked discussions about the sustainability of Twitch’s business model and whether the platform can afford to take strict actions against its highest earners without risking its already shaky financial standing.
High-profile streamers drive significant traffic, engagement, and ultimately profit for Twitch, which creates a dilemma for the platform when these stars cross the line.
The question becomes whether Twitch can afford to ban creators like Asmongold permanently without hurting their own bottom line.
Whether this is a temporary suspension or something more lasting remains to be seen, but one thing’s for sure: This incident is another reminder of the ongoing tension between freedom of expression and the need for respectful conduct online.
“Explain it to Me Like I’m Five”
Who is Asmongold? Asmongold is a popular online personality and streamer, mostly known for his gaming content, particularly around MMORPGs like World of Warcraft. He has a huge following on platforms like Twitch, where he streams live content, and YouTube.
What is Twitch? Twitch is a live streaming platform mainly used by gamers to share their gameplay and interact with their audience in real time. It’s also popular for a variety of other types of content, such as music, cooking, and just chatting streams.
Why was Asmongold banned? He made comments during a live broadcast that were seen as offensive to Palestinian culture. This led to viewers and critics calling out his behavior, and Twitch decided to ban him for breaking their community guidelines on hate speech.
Let’s Keep the Conversation Going
What do you think about Twitch’s decision to ban Asmongold?
Should the platform take even stronger action, or is a temporary suspension enough to set a precedent?
Share your thoughts in the comments or over on social media—let’s dive into what this means for the future of streaming culture.
Lara Croft continues to be too “problematic” for the current year video game industry. After receiving a trigger warning for portrayals of natives in the nearly 30-year-old franchise, gamers were assured that no further alterations would be made to the remaster.
However, eagle-eyed players keep spotting more and more censorship with each update. First, Pierre Du Pont’s bomber jacket was altered. Now Lara’s pinups have apparently been scrubbed from the game.
X user DOA Momiji seemed to be the first to spot the censorship of the pinups, which once appeared above Lara’s locker. This was later retweeted by former Blizzard exec Grummz.
The removal of the pinups apparently came during the latest update on Steam.
This is hardly the first time that the Tomb Raider series has been nerfed in recent years. In fact, Lara Croft’s traditionally sexy figure and the very premise of the series (raiding tombs) are both under fire.
Recently, a tabletop RPG based on Tomb Raider has been announced, and the developer Evil Hat Productions (outspoken publisher of Thirty Sword Lesbians) promised to work with Crystal Dynamics to make the series less offensive for “modern audiences.” Because something, something colonialism.
“Later games released in the franchise have started the work of addressing this by having Lara Croft acknowledge her past mistakes and try to understand and show respect for the cultures and communities she comes into contact with. She has also worked to reform raider culture and raise the awareness of her peers.”
“Lara no longer decorates her mantle with mythic artifacts – as a raider she prioritizes seeking out the truth. Much of this game is inspired by her humanity, struggle with heroism, and her tenacity. We believe that all three aspects are an important component in creating a game that celebrates history and culture while acknowledging the respect and work required to live in a world wounded by colonialism.”
So going forward, we’re talking about Tomb Raider without raiding tombs. And Lara Croft without the sexy coolness that made her an icon in the 1990s.
Why bother making new games in the series at all? Why both rereleasing the older games if they’re going to get retconned for modern sensibilities constantly?
It’s such a bizarre choice that even Brianna Wu has publicly said the developers are being stupid.
Is Tomb Raider yet another example of a once-great franchise that can be thrown on the pile of dead IP sacrificed to appease perpetually outraged Current Year tastemakers?
