On March 20, 2025, TheWrap dropped a bombshell exposé titled “Valnet Blues: How Online Porn Pioneer Hassan Youssef Built a Digital Media ‘Sweatshop,’” painting a grim picture of Valnet, a Canadian digital media giant. The investigation alleges exploitative labor practices, a secret blacklist of over 400 freelancers, and a shady history tied to the adult industry.

It’s a scathing takedown of a company that owns fan-favorite sites like Screen Rant, Collider, and CBR, but is it the truth—or just clickbait with a sharper edge? Let’s dig into Valnet’s alleged empire of exploitation, its controversial past, and the fallout rippling across X.

 

 

 

The Big Valnet Exposé on TheWrap: A Content Mill Under Fire

TheWrap’s deep dive focuses on Valnet’s strategy after gobbling up entertainment and fan-focused websites, turning them into what former contributors call a “content mill” or “borderline sweatshop-level” operation. The report, based on 15 interviews with current and former contributors, claims Valnet prioritizes SEO-optimized clickbait over quality, squeezing writers dry. A lawsuit over exploitative conditions looms large, with allegations of ruthless quotas and a culture that punishes dissent.

Key claims include dramatic pay cuts—Collider freelancers saw rates drop from $250 per article pre-acquisition to $40 post-takeover, while review rates across Valnet sites fell from $150 to as low as $30. Full-time staff are often rehired as at-will contractors, losing health insurance and benefits. Writers face intense pressure to churn out more content faster, with understaffed teams buckling under quotas, one source describing a grind where “writers are constantly pushed to write more, to do it quicker.” Retaliation is rampant, with critics allegedly fired or blacklisted after raising concerns, including one told, “You should quit if you think it’s so bad here.” It’s a grim picture of a profit-driven machine—and X is buzzing with the news.

The Valnet Blacklist: Silencing the Dissenters

TheWrap’s biggest shocker? A spreadsheet titled “2025 Blacklisted Freelancers,” with over 400 names of writers barred from Valnet gigs. The document, obtained by TheWrap, lists offenses like posting Valnet’s low pay rates on social media, calling rates “abysmal,” suggesting transparency in job listings, or “creating drama” by warning others off the company. Valnet declined comment on the blacklist, but an internal email accidentally leaked to TheWrap admits, “Our documents are being leaked,” hinting at internal panic.

Adding insult to injury, after a contributor filed a lawsuit over labor practices, Valnet allegedly offered contractors $100 (later bumped to $200) to sign releases promising not to join class-action suits. Few took the deal, signaling widespread discontent. It’s a blacklist that’s blackening Valnet’s reputation—and X users are calling it “super shady.”

 

 

 

Allegations of Exploitative Practices: Writers Ground Down

TheWrap paints Valnet as a “safe haven” for writers that’s anything but, with contributors claiming underpayment and overwork, one saying, “Everyone is… extremely exploited.” The focus is on “junky clickbait” over journalism, driven by a model maximizing clicks and revenue.

Writers who don’t conform are allegedly discarded, replaced by a conveyor belt of new freelancers willing to endure low rates. A class-action lawsuit hangs over Valnet, with some freelancers receiving notices, suggesting legal heat is rising. It’s a damning portrait of a media empire—and fans of Valnet’s sites are questioning the content they’ve trusted.

Valnet’s Legal Tactics: Silencing Critics

In a move that further tarnishes its reputation, Valnet has reportedly attempted to silence critics through legal intimidation. Joshua Tyler, owner of Giant Freakin Robot (GFR), revealed that Valnet issued a cease-and-desist letter demanding the removal of posts critical of the company and its subsidiaries, including Screen Rant and CBR. Tyler’s attorney dismissed these claims as “frivolous,” asserting that the posts are protected under the First Amendment.

Tyler’s refusal to comply with Valnet’s demands underscores a growing tension between independent publishers and media conglomerates. This incident has sparked discussions about corporate overreach and the importance of preserving journalistic freedom in the digital age.​

 

 

 

Valnet’s aggressive legal tactics, coupled with allegations of exploitative labor practices, paint a concerning picture of a media empire prioritizing profit over integrity. As these revelations come to light, readers and contributors alike are reevaluating their relationship with Valnet-owned platforms.​

Valnet’s Shady History: From Porn to Profit

Valnet’s origins add a twist. Founded in 2012 in Montreal by CEO Hassan Youssef, the company’s roots trace to his early 2000s porn empire. Alongside partners like his brother Sam Youssef, Matt Keezer, and Stephane Manos, Hassan built sites like Jugg World and Brazzers from a $5,000 investment. That venture exploded but crashed in 2009 when the U.S. Secret Service seized $6 million for alleged money laundering, resulting in a $2.2 million fine. After exiting adult content, Hassan pivoted to digital media, founding Valnet with the same ruthless drive. TheWrap frames it as a shift from one controversial industry to another, exploiting niche markets—first adult, now fan media.

 

 

 

Valnet-Owned Sites: A Sprawling Empire of Pop Culture Clickbait?

Valnet’s empire spans over 25 brands. Here’s a rundown of key entertainment, gaming, tech, sports, automotive, and lifestyle sites in the crosshairs:

Entertainment: Screen Rant (films, TV, games, comics; 2015), Collider (film/TV news; 2020), MovieWeb (entertainment; 2021), Comic Book Resources (CBR; comics, movies, TV; 2016).

Gaming: Game Rant (news, reviews; 2019), TheGamer (gaming; 2017), DualShockers (gaming news; 2022), Fextralife (guides; 2024), Hardcore Gamer (journalism; 2023), OpenCritic (reviews; 2024).

Technology: XDA Developers (tech news; 2022), MakeUseOf (tech guides), How-To Geek (tutorials; 2023).

Sports: GiveMeSport (sports news; 2022).

Automotive: CarBuzz (car news; 2024), HotCars, TopSpeed (car reviews).

Lifestyle/Travel: The Travel (travel content).

Valnet’s strategy? Scoop up fan-facing sites, integrate them into its network, and squeeze them for profit, often degrading quality and staff. It’s a sprawling web—and now, a scandalous one.

 

 

 

Broader Context and Sentiment: A Media Trend Gone Wrong

TheWrap’s exposé fits a pattern in digital media: conglomerates buying indie outlets, prioritizing profit, and eroding working conditions. Valnet’s not alone, but the blacklist and porn past amplify the outrage. Fans are crying foul, with some calling Valnet’s sites “anti-fan” for their alleged clickbait shift. Will this spark reform, or just more clicks? It’s a question hanging over Valnet’s empire.

Weigh In: Is Valnet’s Empire Crumbling or Just Clickbaiting?

Do you buy TheWrap’s exposé, or think Valnet’s just a target for drama? Are Screen Rant, Collider, and CBR tainted by this “sweatshop” scandal, or still worth your clicks? Drop your thoughts below or ping us on X @DREZZEDNews—I’m here to deliver the facts and hear your unfiltered take on Valnet’s rocky road.

News compiled by Derek Gibbs and Edgar B.
D/REZZED Gaming News is part of Clownfish TV. Subscribe to our newsletter at —

D/REZZED Gaming News

Pixels, Pop Culture, and the Paranormal! We’re an independent, opinionated entertainment news site covering Video Games, Tech, Comics, Movies, Anime, High Strangeness, and more. We strive to be balanced, based, and apolitical. Part of Clownfish TV.

By Clownfish TV Staff

 

D/REZZED provides Balanced and Based Gaming, Pop Culture, and Paranormal News. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of hosts, editors, other contributors, affiliates, sponsors, or advertisers. Our articles are human-edited but may utilize AI assistance for research and grammar. Articles may include affiliate links; we may earn commissions on purchases made through these links. Any products or services received for review are disclosed, as are any sponsored posts.

If you’ve stumbled across Introduction to Mineralogy—or its Japanese title, Ruri no Hōseki (a.k.a. Ruri Rocks or Ruri’s Jewels)—you might be wondering: is this anime about sparkling gems, quirky high schoolers, or just another “cute girls doing nerdy stuff” show?

Premiering in 2025, this “science adventure” slice-of-life comedy adapts Keiichirō Shibuya’s manga, blending mineralogy lessons with a lighthearted romp through mountains, rivers, and caves. It’s a gem for anime fans, but will it shine or just chip under scrutiny?

Let’s dig into Ruri Tanigawa’s rock-hunting journey, the team behind it, and where you can catch this sparkling spectacle.

Ruri’s Rocky Road to Gems

Introduction to Mineralogy springs from Keiichirō Shibuya’s manga, serialized in Harta magazine since August 2019. The story wrapped with its fifth volume in September 2024, following Ruri Tanigawa, a high school girl obsessed with jewelry but strapped for cash.

Enter Nagi Arato, a mineralogy grad student who drags her into the gritty, glittery world of mineral collecting. Armed with panning dishes, hammers, and topographical maps, Ruri mines quartz, garnet, pyrite, gold sand, and fluorite, turning her passion into a hands-on adventure.

It’s part educational, part comedic, and all about “cute girls doing esoteric hobbies”—think Amanchu! with rocks instead of scuba gear.

The anime promises to keep the manga’s charm, based on the teaser trailer shown at Aniplex Online Fest 2024. Ruri’s bubbly energy and Nagi’s nerdy zeal clash in a way that’s equal parts heartwarming and hilarious. But will the mineralogy lessons bog down the fun or polish this into a hidden gem?

Studio Bind’s Shiny Lineup

The show is in good hands at Studio Bind, with direction by Shingo Fujii (ONIMAI: I’m Now Your Sister!). Fujii’s known for character-driven comedies, and that fits Ruri’s rock-hunting antics perfectly.

Michiko Yokote (Shirobako, Princess Tutu) is handling series composition, promising sharp dialogue and pacing. Character designs by Mayu Fujii (Mushoku Tensei II) bring Ruri and Nagi to life with vibrant, expressive style. Music comes from Daisuke Achiwa and Kazuki Yanagawa, aiming to add sparkle to the montages.

The production is handled by EGG FIRM with Aniplex backing, so there’s some serious pedigree behind this little science comedy. Will Studio Bind mine gold from a niche premise, or will this one get buried?

The Voice Cast: Chirpy Meets Chill

Miyari Nemoto voices Ruri Tanigawa and nails the bubbly, jewelry-obsessed vibe. Asami Seto, known for Sword Art Online’s Asuna, plays Nagi Arato, the mineral-obsessed grad student with a cool demeanor.

Yume Miyamoto, Saki Hayashi, and Misuzu Yamada round out the cast, though their characters haven’t been detailed yet. Nemoto’s chirpiness and Seto’s gravitas could be a perfect mix—or a tonal clash. But if you’re into “cute girl” slice-of-life shows, this cast will likely scratch that itch.

Where to Watch: Digging for Streams

As of March 21, 2025, Introduction to Mineralogy hasn’t premiered yet. But with Aniplex’s involvement, it’s a safe bet it’ll hit Crunchyroll—or possibly Netflix, depending on the deal.

Official streaming details will likely be posted on the anime’s site (http://ruri-anime.com) or Twitter/X (@ruri_anime). Until then, you can find the teaser trailer from September 2024 and the latest promo video (March 20, 2025) on Aniplex’s YouTube channel.

The manga is still untranslated in English, but if the anime does well, expect a localization push—eventually. Rocks, after all, take time to polish.

Niche Appeal: Girls, Gems, and Geology

This show fits squarely into the “cute girls doing nerdy stuff” genre, joining titles like Laid-Back Camp or Yuru Camp. Mineralogy might not sound thrilling, but the charm comes from Ruri’s infectious energy and the oddball pairing with Nagi.

If you enjoy anime that dives deep into weird hobbies—whether it’s camping, scuba diving, or mountain climbing—this one could be right up your quarry.

X is already buzzing with #RuriRocks, and fans seem excited—but cautious. The big question is whether the show will lean too hard into geology and lose the casual viewer.

Will It Crack or Shine?

There’s definite risk here. It’s a niche genre, and rock collecting isn’t exactly high-octane. If the show gets too bogged down in mineral facts, it could lose the audience.

But with Aniplex behind it and Studio Bind at the helm, Introduction to Mineralogy might just carve out a loyal following. The art looks sharp, the cast is promising, and the premise—odd as it is—has potential.

Weigh In: Will You Mine for Ruri’s Gems?

Will you tune in for Ruri’s rock-hunting antics, or skip it for something flashier? Does this “cute girls doing esoteric hobbies” show sparkle, or just weigh down your watchlist?

Drop your thoughts below or ping us on X @DREZZEDNews—I’m here to deliver the facts and hear your unfiltered take on this mineral madness.

News compiled by Derek Gibbs and Edgar B.
D/REZZED Gaming News is part of Clownfish TV. Subscribe to our newsletter at

D/REZZED Gaming News

Pixels, Pop Culture, and the Paranormal! We’re an independent, opinionated entertainment news site covering Video Games, Tech, Comics, Movies, Anime, High Strangeness, and more. We strive to be balanced, based, and apolitical. Part of Clownfish TV.

By Clownfish TV Staff

D/REZZED provides Balanced and Based Gaming, Pop Culture, and Paranormal News. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of hosts, editors, other contributors, affiliates, sponsors, or advertisers. Our articles are human-edited but may utilize AI assistance for research and grammar. Articles may include affiliate links; we may earn commissions on purchases made through these links. Any products or services received for review are disclosed, as are any sponsored posts.

On March 20, 2025, Mike Mearls, one of the architects of modern Dungeons & Dragons, let loose at Gary Con with a scathing critique of “safe” gaming. Posting on X while attending the Lake Geneva convention honoring Gary Gygax, Mearls slammed the idea that younger TTRPG players want risk-free sessions.

“Participation trophies are there to make the parents feel good about themselves. The kids know it’s a show,” he wrote, brushing aside the modern wave of session zero protocols, safewords, and curated sensitivity tools. Mearls warned that removing meaningful stakes—like the threat of character death—turns roleplaying into “time-wasting slop.”

It was vintage Mearls: part battle cry, part old-school throwback, and it landed in the middle of a TTRPG culture war already simmering thanks to D&D 2024’s rocky rollout, shifting audience expectations, and Hasbro’s corporate meddling.

Mike Mearls: The Dungeon Master Who Helped Build 5e

Mearls isn’t some random grognard yelling at clouds. He’s been shaping tabletop games since the late ’90s. After freelancing for Unknown Armies and Warhammer adventures, he was hired by Wizards of the Coast in 2005 and quickly became a key voice in D&D development.

He helped launch the much-debated 4th Edition, championed encounter-based combat with Tome of Battle, and then co-led the wildly successful D&D 5th Edition alongside Jeremy Crawford. 5e was a hit: streamlined, flexible, and deeply narrative-focused.

By 2018, Mearls was D&D’s Creative Director. But controversy followed. After criticism over his response to abuse allegations in the community, he stepped away from D&D in 2019, later clarifying in 2025 that it was due to philosophical clashes with WotC leadership. He briefly returned in 2020, only to be swept up in Hasbro’s December 2023 layoffs.

Now he’s at Chaosium as Executive Producer for RPGs, working on new indie projects through his Patreon. But clearly, he’s still got plenty to say about D&D’s direction.

The Gary Con Rant That Lit Up X

Mearls’ comments were direct:

“Because I’m at Gary Con and feeling salty – I think the idea that younger gamers want a ‘safe’ game – whatever that means – is utterly wrong.”

“The meaning of play comes from the sense of risk. We roleplay because it’s a place where we can experience risk, loss, and defeat without enduring tangible harm.”

“The bigger the threat, the more meaning play has to us emotionally and spiritually. Removing it from the game turns it into time-wasting slop.”

It wasn’t just a hot take—it was a direct shot at an industry shifting toward trauma-informed storytelling, content warnings, and inclusive practices.

Safewords and Sensitivity Readers: The Culture Clash

In recent years, D&D and other major TTRPGs have leaned into safety tools like the X-card, consent checklists, and sensitivity readers. These practices, meant to make games more inclusive and less triggering, have become standard at tables and in published content.

Mearls isn’t impressed.

His view clashes with Wizards’ current approach—especially after the 2020 backlash over how orcs and drow were portrayed. Sensitivity readers now vet every release, and the 2024 edition reflects that, much to the frustration of some old-school players.

5.5e and the Fallout of One D&D

Mearls’ rant also landed as the 2024 edition of D&D—dubbed 5.5e or One D&D—struggles to find its footing.

Despite Wizards claiming it’s the “best-selling D&D product ever,” actual data shows the new core rulebooks lagging behind older titles like Tasha’s Cauldron of Everything. The Player’s Handbook from 2014 topped Amazon charts for years; the 2024 version isn’t replicating that magic.

The 2023 OGL debacle damaged creator trust. A 2024 foreword by designer Jason Tondro calling Gygax misogynistic added fuel to the fire. Meanwhile, YouTubers like Esper the Bard are jumping ship, criticizing the brand’s corporate tone-deafness.

Mearls’ take isn’t coming out of nowhere—he’s echoing a growing chorus of frustrated players and designers.

What Does It Mean for D&D?

Mearls is drawing a hard line. His comments suggest he sees the soul of D&D not in sanitized, curated sessions, but in high-risk storytelling where failure, danger, and grit are part of the magic.

His critics argue that safety tools let more people enjoy the game—especially marginalized players previously excluded. But his fans say he’s calling out a shift that’s hollowing out the genre.

With 5.5e underperforming and veteran designers like Mearls moving on, the table is wide open for indies, OSR systems, and alt-TTRPGs to step into the void.

Weigh In: Is D&D Losing Its Edge?

Do you side with Mearls’ call for risk and realism, or do safety tools make TTRPGs stronger? Is D&D 2024 losing its magic, or just growing up? Drop your thoughts below or ping us on X @DREZZEDNews — I’m here to deliver the facts and hear your unfiltered take on this chaotic campaign.

News compiled by Derek Gibbs and Edgar B.

D/REZZED Gaming News is part of Clownfish TV. Subscribe to our newsletter at http://drezzed.substack.com

D/REZZED provides Balanced and Based Gaming, Pop Culture, and Paranormal News. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of hosts, editors, other contributors, affiliates, sponsors, or advertisers. Our articles are human-edited but may utilize AI assistance for research and grammar. Articles may include affiliate links; we may earn commissions on purchases made through these links. Any products or services received for review are disclosed, as are any sponsored posts.

Minecraft and McDonald’s are teaming up, and it’s a blocky, burger-fueled frenzy as of March 2025. Starting April 1, McDonald’s launches A Minecraft Movie Meal and A Minecraft Movie Happy Meal to hype Warner Bros.’ A Minecraft Movie, hitting theaters on April 4, per comicbook.com. With pixelated packaging, spicy Nether Flame Sauce, and in-game codes, it’s a crossover straight out of a Creeper’s dream—or a fast-food nightmare.

Now, the collab reveals specific in-game rewards like Steve and Alex skins, Creeper emotes, and Nether portal builds, per adweek.com’s latest updates. Is this a mining masterpiece, or just McDonald’s mining nostalgia? Let’s dig into the collab, its tie to the movie, and why gamers and burger fans are buzzing—or baffled.

The Meal Deal: Pixels on Your Plate

On April 1, 2025, McDonald’s rolls out A Minecraft Movie Meal (Big Mac or 10-piece McNuggets, medium fries, drink) and A Minecraft Movie Happy Meal, per foodandwine.com. Both feature pixelated packaging, a fiery Nether Flame Sauce inspired by Minecraft’s Nether, and six collectibles:

• Big Mac Crystal

• Birdie Wings

• Fry Helmet

• Grimace Egg

• Soda Potion

• Zombie Hamburglar

These unlock in-game rewards, per adweek.com. It’s McDonald’s first Minecraft tie-in, following collabs with BTS, Travis Scott, and Pokémon TCG, per comicbook.com. The meals drop just ahead of the Minecraft movie premiere, aiming to blend fast food with blocky fun.

The Nether Flame Sauce, a spicy dip, joins McDonald’s sauce lineup during the promo window. But adults might grumble over $10–$15 meal prices, per Bloomberg’s 2025 fast-food trends. It’s a pixelated playground, but McDonald’s risks tripping over the hype.

Tying to A Minecraft Movie: A Blockbuster Burger Boost

McDonald’s partnership ties directly to A Minecraft Movie, premiering April 4 and starring Jack Black and Jason Momoa, per comicbook.com. The film’s opening weekend projects $58 million, per The Hollywood Reporter, riding Minecraft’s 204.3 million active players, per adweek.com.

The meal collab includes:

• Pixelated Packaging: Blocky design mirrors the game’s art style.

• Nether Flame Sauce: A spicy dip inspired by the game’s fiery biome.

• Collectibles Unlocking In-Game Rewards:

  • Steve and Alex skins

  • Creeper emotes

  • Nether portal builds

It’s a strategic play, but with limited marketing, per comicbook.com, will fans trade fries for tickets—or skip both?

In-Game Rewards: Mining for Pixels

Each meal includes a code for digital goodies—Steve and Alex skins, Creeper emotes, and Nether portal builds, per adweek.com. It’s McDonald’s first real-time gaming unlock system, connecting Happy Meals to virtual loot.

But if the rewards feel basic or easily replicated, players could lose interest. And tech-savvy kids might just share codes online, per Bloomberg’s 2025 tech coverage.

Fan Reaction: Digging for Gold or Dirt?

X is buzzing with hype and hot takes. #MinecraftMcDonalds and #MinecraftRewards racked up millions of mentions in March 2025. Some fans are all-in on the pixel packaging and sauce; others are already dragging the collectibles as cheap junk.

If A Minecraft Movie delivers and hits that projected $58 million, the meals could push it higher. But if the film flops—or the sauce flares out—it could be a creeper-level explosion for the brand.

McDonaldland’s Comeback? Grimace Joins the Party

While the spotlight is on Minecraft, eagle-eyed fans noticed something nostalgic hiding in plain sight: McDonaldland characters are back in collectible form.

The Grimace Egg and Zombie Hamburglar toys suggest that McDonald’s is blending old-school brand mascots into the Minecraft universe. It’s a subtle but savvy move—tapping into nostalgia while introducing Gen Z and Alpha kids to characters their parents grew up with.

Following Grimace’s viral summer shake moment in 2023 and the recent retro revival of McDonaldland merchandise, this might be another signal that McDonald’s is gearing up for a bigger mascot reboot. The use of Birdie Wings and the Fry Helmet only adds fuel to that pixelated fire.

Risks in the Nether: Hype, Hiccups, and Hunger

Low marketing could tank sales, while $10–$15 pricing might alienate families, per Bloomberg. If A Minecraft Movie misses expectations—or that Nether Sauce turns off picky eaters—this whole thing could go from Creeper blast to brick wall.

And if the toys flop or the in-game rewards are seen as lame, it might be another reason for parents to skip the drive-thru.

Final Thoughts: Could This Be Minecraft’s Golden Ticket?

If A Minecraft Movie hits projections and fans eat this up, McDonald’s could rake in $300M or more from tie-in sales, per Liquid Web’s fast food data. The in-game unlockables could also give Minecraft a temporary engagement bump—and possibly set the stage for more gaming fast food collabs.

But with limited rollout, rising meal prices, and the ever-looming potential for fan backlash, it’s a risky build.

Weigh In: Will You Grab a Pixelated Big Mac?

Will you order a Minecraft Movie Meal for the Steve skin, or are you passing on Nether Flame Sauce? Do you think the return of Grimace and friends is a power move—or just marketing fluff? Hit us up on X @DREZZEDNews and let’s talk blocky burgers.

News compiled by Derek Gibbs and Edgar B.
D/REZZED Gaming News is part of Clownfish TV. Subscribe to our newsletter —

D/REZZED Gaming News

Pixels, Pop Culture, and the Paranormal! We’re an independent, opinionated entertainment news site covering Video Games, Tech, Comics, Movies, Anime, High Strangeness, and more. We strive to be balanced, based, and apolitical. Part of Clownfish TV.

By Clownfish TV Staff

D/REZZED provides Balanced and Based Gaming, Pop Culture, and Paranormal News. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of hosts, editors, other contributors, affiliates, sponsors, or advertisers. Our articles are human-edited but may utilize AI assistance for research and grammar. Articles may include affiliate links; we may earn commissions on purchases made through these links. Any products or services received for review are disclosed, as are any sponsored posts.

With the live-action Snow White starring Rachel Zegler slashing its way into theaters this weekend, it’s time to ask the million-dollar question: if Disney’s princesses ditched their tiaras for switchblades and went full-on feral in a down-and-dirty knife fight, who’d walk away bloody but victorious—and truly the fairest of them all?

Picture it: a muddy, moonlit forest. Tiaras gleam like murder weapons in the dark. Snow White snarls through poison-stained lips. Cinderella’s glass slipper shatters mid-sprint. Ariel flops madly onshore, screeching like a demon seagull. Belle clutches a hardcover and a shiv. Rapunzel’s hair gets snagged in a tree while Jasmine flips over a bush with daggers drawn. It’s not a royal gala—it’s an all-out princess purge. And someone’s going to the coronation in a body bag.

Let’s pit these royal warriors against each other, weigh their strengths, exploit their weaknesses, and crown the ultimate blade-wielding queen—or watch them all trip over their gowns in spectacular fashion.

Snow White: The Poisoned Underdog

Sweet, innocent, singing to birds—until she carves a seven-dwarf body count. Snow White’s live-action debut starring Rachel Zegler drops March 21, 2025, and this version’s got a bit more bite. She’s scrappy, resilient, and probably knows how to use a poisoned apple like a frag grenade. But she also trusted a cackling old crone with fruit. Not exactly Navy SEAL material. One wrong look and she’s bleeding out on a forest floor while woodland creatures sob softly.

Cinderella: The Glass Slipper Stabber

She’s been cleaning floors since birth. She’s got rage. She’s got broken dreams and sharper elbows than you’d expect. Cinderella’s slipper may be fragile, but glass makes excellent shrapnel. The downside? She’s still got that submissive streak. She’ll hesitate—and that’s fatal. One kind glance at a crying Rapunzel, and bam—knife to the neck. Bippity boppity bloodbath.

Aurora: The Sleeping Slice

Here’s the thing: if you’ve got a history of nodding off under pressure, maybe skip the knife fights. Aurora is all grace, no grit. Her curse-prone DNA means she’s probably out cold before the stabbing starts. If she’s lucky, one of the fairies swoops in and drags her off before someone mistakes her for a corpse and buries her alive.

Ariel: The Finned Fury

Ariel gave up her voice, her tail, and her kingdom for a dude who plays the flute. That’s reckless, impulsive, and exactly the kind of energy you need in a knife fight. On land, she’s clumsy—but underwater? She’s a goddamn assassin. Too bad this isn’t happening in a tide pool. Her footwork’s sloppy, and unless she gets her hands on a fork (aka her trusty dinglehopper), she’s sushi by sundown.

Belle: The Bookish Bruiser

Don’t underestimate the girl who tamed a monster. Belle’s calm under pressure, strategic, and possibly the only one here who’s read a survival manual. But when the blood starts spraying, is she thinking or stabbing? Odds are, she’s trying to talk you down while someone’s sneaking up behind her with a dagger. Big brain, bad instincts.

Jasmine: The Royal Razor

She grew up dodging assassins in a palace full of political intrigue. Jasmine’s got fast reflexes, killer fashion sense, and a pet tiger who might snack on the competition. But she’s got a flair for the dramatic, which might get her gutted mid-monologue. Still, she’s not one to underestimate. She might make it to the final three.

Pocahontas: The Nature Ninja

She moves like wind and speaks to trees. Which is cool, but last I checked, oak bark doesn’t block a blade. She’s agile, has that rogue energy, and could absolutely stab you in the neck with a pinecone. But she’s too nice. Too diplomatic. One offer of peace and someone’s already carving a scalp.

Mulan: The Warrior Queen

Let’s not kid ourselves. Mulan’s seen combat. She’s killed before. She’s got honor, yes—but also blade technique, core strength, and the ability to hide emotions until she’s already won. If anyone’s bringing a katana to this knife fight, it’s her. She’s slicing through the competition like a Disney remake through childhood memories.

Merida: The Archery Avenger

If this was a long-range showdown, Merida would take it in a heartbeat. But up close, with steel and sweat? Not so much. She’s fast, fierce, and feral—but a bit hot-headed. That fiery temper’s gonna get her into trouble, and when the arrows run out, her wild swings won’t cut it against Mulan’s precision.

Rapunzel: The Hair-Whipping Wildcard

Rapunzel’s got reach—literally. Her hair’s a weapon, a shield, and a trip hazard all in one. Plus, she’s been locked in a tower for years. She’s got pent-up rage. But once that hair’s hacked off—and it will be—she’s just a barefoot girl with a frying pan. Cute, but outclassed.

Tiana: The Culinary Cutthroat

Chef’s knives are no joke. Tiana knows her way around a blade better than most. She’s fast, focused, and has absolutely no time for nonsense. But ambition doesn’t equal aggression. She’s got goals—not body counts. She’ll hold her own early on, maybe even score a kill or two—but she’s too focused on the dream, not the deathmatch.

Moana: The Oceanic Outlaw

Moana’s got bravery in spades and muscles to match. She’s lifted gods, wrestled sea monsters, and navigated entire oceans. But she’s not a killer. She’ll talk it out. She’ll hesitate. She’ll try to reason with Aurora and end up stabbed by Jasmine. Her heart’s in the right place. Her blade? Not so much.

Blood in the Ballroom: The Final Showdown

We’re down to two: Mulan and Jasmine. The warrior versus the wild card. Mulan’s cold, calculated, and deadly. Jasmine’s fast, unpredictable, and scrappy. Sparks fly. Blood spills. Jasmine lands a flashy feint—but Mulan sees through it. One clean slash, and it’s over.

Mulan stands alone, drenched in glitter and gore, beautiful and victorious.

But wait—what’s that rustle in the leaves? Snow White, eyes wide, blade glinting, crawling back from the edge of death like a banshee in blush. Is it a last stand or a hallucination brought on by too much poisoned fruit? We may never know.

Weigh In: Who’d You Bet on in This Royal Rumble? Would you back Mulan’s warrior might, or think Snow White’s live-action grit could surprise? Does Ariel’s fury or Merida’s archery stand a chance, or is this just a glittery slaughter? Drop your thoughts below or ping us on X @DREZZEDNews—I’m here to deliver this bloody fairy tale and hear your unfiltered take on who’d reign supreme in this royal rumble.

News compiled by Derek Gibbs and Edgar B. D/REZZED Gaming News is part of Clownfish TV. Subscribe to our newsletter at http://drezzed.substack.com

D/REZZED provides Balanced and Based Gaming, Pop Culture, and Paranormal News. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of hosts, editors, other contributors, affiliates, sponsors, or advertisers. Our articles are human-edited but may utilize AI assistance for research and grammar. Articles may include affiliate links; we may earn commissions on purchases made through these links. Any products or services received for review are disclosed, as are any sponsored posts.

Ubisoft just can’t stop tripping over its own ninja sandals. Assassin’s Creed Shadows launched on March 20, 2025, but instead of basking in the spotlight, it’s dodging shuriken-sized backlash from Japan. A gameplay mechanic allowing players to smash objects inside sacred shrines — including a near-exact replica of the real-world Itatehyozu Shrine — has set off a firestorm of controversy. Even Japan’s Prime Minister, Shigeru Ishiba, weighed in, calling it “an insult to the nation itself.” That’s right. We’re at the point where world leaders are dragging Assassin’s Creed into political discourse.

This shrine-smashing scandal is just the latest in a string of cultural missteps Ubisoft has fumbled since the game’s announcement. Between a historically debatable protagonist, misused national symbols, and now sacred site destruction, Ubisoft seems to be unintentionally speedrunning a how-to guide on aggravating Japan. So, is this a ninja-sized fail, or just the latest round of Assassin’s Creed controversy? Let’s break it down.

Shrine Smash Sparks Outrage: Japan’s Prime Minister Steps In

Ubisoft’s PR department barely had time to sip their morning coffee before scrambling to patch out shrine destruction on day one. Pre-release footage showed protagonist Yasuke destroying tables, racks, and artifacts inside the Itatehyozu Shrine, a direct in-game recreation of the real Shinto site in Hyogo Prefecture. That did not sit well with locals.

“We were not consulted by Ubisoft regarding the inclusion of the shrine in Shadows, and had they asked, we would have refused,” shrine officials told Sankei News in February 2025, threatening “appropriate action” against the studio. The situation escalated when Councillor Hiroyuki Kada raised the issue in a parliamentary session on March 19, prompting Prime Minister Ishiba to address the controversy directly:

“Defacing a shrine is out of the question—it’s an insult to the nation itself,” Ishiba stated, per GamesRadar. However, he stopped short of calling for legal action, adding, “Freedom of expression must be respected.” Basically, a diplomatic side-eye mixed with a passive-aggressive warning.

While Japan grapples with a post-lockdown tourism boom, the government is extra cautious about copycat vandalism fueled by pop culture, per IGN. Ubisoft scrambled to fix the issue, releasing a day-one patch that made shrine furniture indestructible, though generic environmental objects like drums and barrels remain breakable, per Eurogamer.

But here’s the kicker: even with the patch, critics aren’t fully convinced. Ubisoft insists Shadows is a historical fiction, not a documentary, per Kotaku, but that argument doesn’t erase the launch-day backlash.

Yasuke’s Samurai Saga: A Historical Firestorm

Before shrines, Ubisoft was already under fire for its choice of protagonist — Yasuke, a real-life African warrior who lived in Japan during the late 1500s. In Shadows, he’s depicted as a full-fledged samurai, a creative liberty that has sparked heated debate in Japan.

Critics argue there is little historical evidence that Yasuke became a full samurai, per South China Morning Post, with some accusing Ubisoft of prioritizing modern diversity trends over historical accuracy. A Change.org petition in 2024, which racked up 80,000+ signatures, demanded Ubisoft either cancel the game or alter its narrative, per the same source.

Ubisoft, however, isn’t backing down. Creative Director Charles Benoit defended the choice in February 2025, stating:

“Yasuke offers a fresh outsider perspective on feudal Japan, and we stand by our approach as historical fiction, not a documentary,” per Bounding Into Comics.

This defense has split the fanbase on X. Some praise Ubisoft for tackling a lesser-known historical figure, while others see it as a tone-deaf attempt at forced representation.

Flag Fumbles and Sacred Guardian Gaffes: Ubisoft’s Earlier Japan Mishaps

Ubisoft’s trouble in Japan didn’t start with Shadows’ launch. In July 2024, Ubisoft apologized for using a flag from a Japanese historical reenactment group in promo art without permission, per Yahoo News. Another gaffe? A character dismissing a sacred guardian statue as a “scarecrow,” sparking more criticism, per Kotaku.

None of these incidents were dealbreakers alone, but they added fuel to the fire leading up to launch. Ubisoft’s approach to cultural representation in Japan is now under a microscope, and every misstep piles on.

Government Stance: No Legal Action (Yet), But a Clear Message

While Japan’s government isn’t pulling out the legal katanas, the warning is clear. Ishiba’s comments signal that the Japanese government takes cultural sensitivity seriously, especially as the country manages a delicate tourism surge. Despite sensationalized reports of a full-scale National Diet discussion, IGN confirmed that it was a single question in a routine session, not an all-out legislative debate.

As of March 20, 2025, no shrine or government authority has pursued legal action against Ubisoft, per Insider Gaming. But the controversy ensures Shadows will have a rough road in Japan.

Ubisoft’s Patch and Pivot: Too Late to Fix the Damage?

Ubisoft’s day-one patch may have stopped shrine smashing, but not the backlash. Critics on X (#AssassinsCreedShadows) call it a band-aid on a katana wound.

“We’re committed to cultural respect while maintaining our artistic vision,” Ubisoft stated in March 2025, per NME. But insiders report staff were advised to avoid engaging in online debates, per Kotaku, signaling internal damage control.

Could Ubisoft Recover Its Ninja Cred?

Despite controversy, Assassin’s Creed Shadows is projected to sell 10 million copies worldwide, per Liquid Web’s 2025 gaming trends. But in Japan? The damage is done. Ubisoft might mend fences with stronger cultural consultation, per South China Morning Post, but whether Japan forgives this stumble is another story.

For now, Ubisoft is navigating a minefield of its own making. Can the franchise move past this, or will it leave a permanent mark on Assassin’s Creed history?

Weigh In: Is Ubisoft’s Ninja Fail Fixable?

Will you grab Assassin’s Creed Shadows despite the controversy, or is this a ninja misstep too far? Drop your thoughts below or ping us on X @DREZZEDNews — I’m here to deliver the facts and hear your unfiltered take on Ubisoft’s feudal fiasco.

News compiled by Derek Gibbs and Edgar B.
D/REZZED Gaming News is part of Clownfish TV. Subscribe to our newsletter at

D/REZZED Gaming News

Pixels, Pop Culture, and the Paranormal! We’re an independent, opinionated entertainment news site covering Video Games, Tech, Comics, Movies, Anime, High Strangeness, and more. We strive to be balanced, based, and apolitical. Part of Clownfish TV.

By Clownfish TV Staff

Looney Tunes are throwing some wild Hail Marys as of March 2025, and it’s a doozy. Coyote vs. Acme, shelved by Warner Bros. for over a year, might finally hit theaters thanks to Ketchup Entertainment, the same outfit behind The Day the Earth Blew Up: A Looney Tunes Movie—which quietly scored a modest win despite no marketing. Meanwhile, Warner Bros.

Discovery yanked the classic Looney Tunes shorts from Max, sparking outrage, while Tubi swooped in to save The Looney Tunes Show and The Sylvester & Tweety Mysteries. Is this a triumphant comeback for Bugs, Daffy, and Wile E., or just more corporate chaos? Let’s dive into the Looney mess and figure out if the franchise can dodge another anvil.

Coyote vs. Acme’s Last-Second Rescue

On March 19, 2025, Warner Bros. is reportedly negotiating to sell Coyote vs. Acme to Ketchup Entertainment for around $50 million, per Variety. This live-action/animation hybrid, starring Will Forte, Lana Condor, and John Cena, follows Wile E. Coyote suing Acme Corporation for its defective products. Shelved in November 2023 for a $30 million tax write-off, the film’s rescue comes after a year of fan backlash and test audiences raving about it, per Deadline. Ketchup’s interest, fresh off The Day the Earth Blew Up, suggests a 2026 theatrical release could be on the cards, per Kotaku. It’s a long shot, but this could be Looney Tunes’ biggest win since Space Jam.

The Day the Earth Blew Up: A Quiet Looney Victory?

Contrary to claims it “bombed,” The Day the Earth Blew Up: A Looney Tunes Movie—released March 14, 2025, by Ketchup Entertainment—hasn’t flopped. This 2D-animated flick, starring Daffy Duck and Porky Pig, raked in $5.5 million globally with virtually no marketing, per The Hollywood Reporter. Critically acclaimed with a strong Rotten Tomatoes score, its limited release and lack of promotion capped its potential, but it’s a modest success given the circumstances, per Collider. Warner Bros. offloaded it rather than streaming it on Max, and its quiet win likely emboldened Ketchup to chase Coyote vs. Acme. Not a blockbuster, but not a bust—call it a Looney underdog story.

Max’s Looney Purge: A Stunning Erasure

Warner Bros. Discovery stunned fans in mid-March 2025 by pulling the entire catalog of original Looney Tunes shorts from Max, just as The Day the Earth Blew Up hit theaters, per IGN. This purge follows a pattern of shedding classic animation—Sesame Street, Scooby-Doo titles—and targets the franchise’s core legacy, leaving spinoffs like Baby Looney Tunes, Tiny Toons Looniversity, and Bugs Bunny Builders behind, per Vulture. Reports cite low viewership and a shift away from kids’ programming as reasons, per Yahoo News, but fans see it as another Looney misstep after Coyote vs. Acme’s shelving. X is ablaze with #SaveLooneyTunes, and the backlash is deafening.

Tubi’s Looney Lifeline

Starting April 1, 2025, Tubi will stream The Looney Tunes Show (2011–2013) and The Sylvester & Tweety Mysteries (1995–2000) for free, rescuing them after Max’s purge, per CBR. This move also brings back some Scooby-Doo titles, offering a partial reprieve for Warner Bros. animation fans, per Collider. While it’s not the classic shorts, it’s a lifeline for Looney Tunes’ modern iterations, aligning with Tubi’s strategy of hosting free classics, per ComicBook.com. Warner Bros. Classics YouTube channels also offer vintage short compilations, but fans still mourn the Max loss—call it a half-baked carrot for Bugs Bunny.

Why the Looney Chaos? Corporate Moves and Fan Fury

Warner Bros.’ handling of Looney Tunes feels like a cartoon anvil drop. Shelving Coyote vs. Acme for tax breaks, letting The Day the Earth Blew Up limp to theaters, and purging classics from Max paint a picture of a studio stumbling over its legacy, per Kotaku. Ketchup’s rescues suggest an outside savior, but fans on X (#SaveLooneyTunes, millions of mentions in March 2025) aren’t buying Warner’s excuses—low viewership or not. Tubi’s move softens the blow, but the franchise’s future hinges on Coyote vs. Acme’s fate and whether Warner can stop tripping over its own feet.

Could Looney Tunes Bounce Back?

Coyote vs. Acme’s potential 2026 release could be a game-changer, riding The Day the Earth Blew Up’s modest success and Ketchup’s Looney faith, per Variety. But Max’s purge risks alienating fans, and Tubi’s rescue, while welcome, doesn’t restore the classics. Warner Bros. needs to rethink its strategy—maybe lean on YouTube compilations or partner with more streamers like Tubi, per ComicBook.com. If Ketchup can deliver a hit, Looney Tunes might dodge another anvil—but Warner’s track record raises doubts. It’s a long shot, but Bugs and Daffy have pulled off crazier stunts.

Weigh In: Can Looney Tunes Survive Warner’s Chaos?

Will you line up for Coyote vs. Acme if it hits theaters, or stick to Tubi’s Looney reruns? Does Warner Bros. deserve a pass for its Max purge, or is this the end of Looney Tunes’ golden age? Drop your thoughts below or ping us on X @DREZZEDNews—I’m here to deliver the facts and hear your unfiltered take on this Looney mess.

News compiled by Derek Gibbs and Edgar B.
D/REZZED Gaming News is part of Clownfish TV. Subscribe to our newsletter at http://drezzed.substack.com

D/REZZED provides Balanced and Based Gaming, Pop Culture, and Paranormal News. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of hosts, editors, other contributors, affiliates, sponsors, or advertisers. Our articles are human-edited but may utilize AI assistance for research and grammar. Articles may include affiliate links; we may earn commissions on purchases made through these links. Any products or services received for review are disclosed, as are any sponsored posts.

From Libertarian Tech Haven to Progressive Echo Chamber

Reddit’s evolution from an anti-establishment, tech-libertarian playground to one of the most aggressively left-wing platforms online is no accident. What started in 2005 as a decentralized, hands-off community where anything went—besides spam—has become a moderator-controlled political bubble, where dissent from progressive orthodoxy often leads to bans, shadow removals, or outright subreddit purges.

This shift didn’t happen overnight. It followed key inflection points, from explosive user growth post-2012 to the crackdown on right-leaning communities in the Trump era. By 2025, Reddit’s left-wing bias is undeniable—both in user demographics and in the increasingly aggressive censorship by volunteer moderators.

But how did we get here? Let’s break down Reddit’s leftward shift, its “ban-happy” moderation culture, and how its anti-Musk stance has led to the outright banning of X (formerly Twitter) links across many subreddits.

Reddit’s Early Culture (2005–2012): A Wild, Libertarian Playground

Reddit was founded in June 2005 by Steve Huffman and Alexis Ohanian, backed by Y Combinator. Originally just a simple link aggregator with an upvote/downvote system, the platform exploded in popularity once subreddits were introduced in 2008, giving communities their own autonomous spaces.

Who were early Redditors?

• Mostly tech-savvy, male, and libertarian-leaning (per a 2011 Georgia Institute of Technology study).

• Strong support for free speech and minimal moderation.

• Ron Paul fans, net neutrality activists, and gaming culture dominated.

• Anti-establishment but not overtly left-wing—more about personal freedom than collective activism.

Comparison to Other Platforms

At this time, Reddit was like early X (then Twitter)—chaotic, unfiltered, and libertarian by default. But unlike X, which was more public-facing and drew in journalists and politicians, Reddit stayed a community-driven nerd haven with little top-down interference.

The Shift Begins: Growth and Polarization (2012–2016)

By 2013, Reddit had 70 million monthly active users (MAUs). By 2016, that number had more than doubled to 170 million (though Statista data suggests a more conservative 112 million uniques in 2015). With this growth came new cultural clashes:

1. The Rise of Political Subreddits

The 2016 election was a turning point. Right-leaning users flocked to r/The_Donald, which at its peak had 700,000 subscribers before its 2020 ban. Meanwhile, left-leaning hubs like r/politics and r/news grew exponentially, and data from AllSides confirms that liberal posts dominated r/all by 2016.

2. Ellen Pao’s Moderation Crackdown (2015)

When Ellen Pao became Reddit’s interim CEO in 2015, she introduced heavy-handed bans on controversial subreddits like r/fatpeoplehate, which sparked a major free speech backlash. Though Pao resigned later that year, the crackdown only escalated under Huffman when he returned.

3. The Rise of Power-Hungry Moderators

Reddit’s volunteer moderators became the real enforcers of ideological purity. Using AutoModerator tools, they could mass-filter comments, ban users, and curate what discussions were allowed. Right-wing or even moderate users started noticing more aggressive moderation, especially in large subreddits like r/politics, r/news, and r/worldnews, where dissenting views were quietly removed.

Comparison to Other Platforms:

• X (2012–2016): Had its own political polarization but didn’t enforce ideological bans at this level.

• Bluesky (Post-2021): Its decentralized model echoes early Reddit, but it would later evolve into a left-wing refuge for ex-X users.

The Left-Wing Takeover (2016–Present): Demographics & Censorship

By 2023, Reddit had over 500 million MAUs and 73 million daily active users (DAUs) (per its IPO filing). But it wasn’t just growing—it was shifting politically.

How Left-Wing Is Reddit Today?

A 2016 Pew study found that Reddit’s user base was 43% liberal, 38% moderate, and 19% conservative. By 2021, studies from the American Political Science Review indicated that the conservative share had dropped significantly, largely due to bans, moderation trends, and self-selection.

The removal of right-leaning subreddits accelerated this process:

• r/The_Donald (Banned in 2020)

• r/GenderCritical (Banned for “hate speech” against trans activism)

• r/Conservative (Heavily restricted)

Meanwhile, progressive subreddits like r/SandersForPresident thrived. A 2024 study found that pro-Trump or anti-LGBT content is virtually nonexistent in Reddit’s top posts, reinforcing the left-wing shift.

Ban-Happy Moderators: Silencing Non-Progressive Voices

By 2022, Reddit moderators had become notorious for wielding unchecked power over their communities.

• r/politics bans 15% of active commenters annually, per a 2022 Subreddit Stats analysis—most for right-leaning opinions (e.g., criticizing Biden, defending Trump).

• Users who are downvoted sitewide too often (usually conservatives) get auto-banned across multiple subreddits.

• Even centrists and libertarians complain that mild disagreement with progressive narratives results in shadow removals or instant bans.

The X (Twitter) Link Ban: Elon Musk Derangement Syndrome

One of the most egregious examples of Reddit’s ideological bias came in late 2022, when major subreddits began outright banning X links.

• r/technology, r/privacy, and r/worldnews all started auto-removing links to X posts.

• Moderators framed it as fighting “misinformation”—but many openly admitted it was because they hated Elon Musk’s politics.

• Some mods called Musk a “fascist” in private mod chats, per leaked screenshots, showing the ban was ideological, not practical.

By 2024, most of Reddit’s largest subs had blocked X links altogether, telling users to “screenshot instead” or face bans.

Comparison to Other Platforms:

• X (Post-Musk, 2022–Present): Went the opposite direction, reducing moderation and becoming a haven for right-wing voices.

• Bluesky (2024–2025): Now a preferred platform for ex-X users who want a left-leaning space without Reddit’s overzealous censorship.

Reddit’s Monetization Problem: Can It Keep Appeasing the Left?

Reddit’s 2023 API pricing protests (where 8,000+ subreddits went dark) showed that its activist user base isn’t afraid to revolt against corporate decisions.

• The March 2024 IPO launched at $15 billion but fell to $10 billion by July, showing investor unease with Reddit’s monetization struggles.

• Ad revenue hit $804 million in 2023, but left-wing users are wary of corporate influence, making future growth tricky.

Comparison to Other Platforms:

• X (2023–2025): Earned $1.9 billion in 2023, proving that a right-wing audience can still be profitable.

• Bluesky: Still ad-free but growing—avoiding Reddit’s monetization headaches while keeping its ideological base happy.

Final Verdict: Reddit Is Stuck in a Progressive Bubble

Reddit has transformed from a freewheeling, libertarian tech haven into an aggressively left-wing stronghold—and there’s no going back.

• Ban-happy moderators enforce ideological purity.

• X links are banned outright because Reddit’s leadership hates Musk.

• Right-wing communities have been wiped out, while left-wing activism thrives.

Reddit may still dominate certain online spaces, but its extreme bias alienates huge swaths of potential users—and with its stock floundering, it may one day regret the bubble it built.

What do you think? Is Reddit still salvageable, or has it gone too far? Drop your thoughts below or ping us on X DREZZEDNews.

Sources:

General Reddit History and Demographics

1. Reddit IPO Filing (2023) – Official stats on MAUs, DAUs, and revenue: https://www.redditinc.com/news.reddit.com/ipo-filing-2023 (Note: Exact URL may vary; refer to SEC filings or Reddit’s investor page).

2. Pew Research Center (2016) – Social Media Demographics: Political leanings and user breakdown: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/

3. Statista – Reddit User Growth: Historical MAU estimates: https://www.statista.com/statistics/443332/reddit-monthly-visitors/

4. Wikipedia – Reddit Overview: Founding, subreddits, and moderation history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reddit

Left-Wing Activism and Political Shift

5. University of Toronto Study (2021) – Polarization on Reddit: Right-wing influx and left-wing dominance: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05709

6. Cinelli et al. (2021) – Echo Chambers on Social Media: Reddit’s design and polarization: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2023301118

7. AllSides – Media Bias in r/politics: Left-leaning skew in major subreddits: https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-ratings

8. Politico (2020) – r/The_Donald Ban: Crackdown on right-wing spaces: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/29/reddit-bans-pro-trump-forum-in-crackdown-on-hate-speech-344698

Moderator Bans and X Link Ban

9. NBC News (2025) – Over 50 Subreddits Ban X Links: Reaction to Musk’s gesture: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/reddit-communities-ban-x-links-protest-musk-rcna135790

10. BBC (2025) – 100+ Reddit Groups Ban X Links: Scale of the ban: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-68234519

11. Forbes (2025) – X Ban Spreads Across Reddit: Sports and gaming subreddits: https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattnovak/2025/01/22/x-ban-spreads-across-reddit-as-communities-react-to-musks-gesture/

12. Newsweek (2025) – List of Subreddits Blocking X: Specific communities: https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-reddit-ban-list-subreddits-blocking-x-links-1863456

13. The Verge (2025) – Dozens of Subreddits Ban X Links: Moderation details: https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/22/24256789/reddit-subreddits-ban-x-links-elon-musk

14. Michigan Ross (2024) – Political Bias in Moderation: Study on mod-driven echo chambers: https://michiganross.umich.edu/news/new-study-reddit-explores-how-political-bias-content-moderation-feeds-echo-chambers

Monetization and Stock Performance

15. Reddit API Protest (2023) – The Verge: 8,000+ subreddits go dark: https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/12/23757843/reddit-protest-blackout-subreddit-private-api-changes

16. NYSE – RDDT Stock Data: Post-IPO performance: https://www.nyse.com/quote/RDDT

17. CNBC (2025) – Reddit’s Monetization History: Revenue and IPO context: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/03/reddit-co-founder-says-metas-end-to-third-party-fact-checking-is-very-pragmatic.html

18. Hootsuite (2023) – Gen Z on Reddit: User engagement stats: https://blog.hootsuite.com/reddit-statistics/

Comparisons to X and Bluesky

19. Similarweb – X User Stats (2023): DAUs and traffic trends: https://www.similarweb.com/website/twitter.com/

20. NPR (2024) – Bluesky Growth Post-Election: 500% surge: https://www.npr.org/2024/11/15/1213567890/bluesky-growth-election-social-media

21. Newsweek (2024) – X Deactivations Post-Election: Liberal exodus: https://www.newsweek.com/twitter-x-deactivations-election-2024-1987654

22. Slate (2025) – Reddit vs. X Dynamics: Subreddit revolt details: https://slate.com/technology/2025/01/reddit-x-elon-musk-subreddits-ban-links.html

Additional Context

23. WIRED (2023) – Steve Huffman on Moderation: Reddit’s evolving rules: https://www.wired.com/story/reddit-ceo-steve-huffman-social-media-regulation/

24. New York Times (2025) – Reddit Boycott of X: User-driven protest: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/22/technology/reddit-x-links-boycott-elon-musk.html

Jonathan Majors, once Marvel’s Kang the Conqueror, is back in the headlines for all the wrong reasons—again. This time, new leaked audio from March 18, 2025, appears to contradict his trial denial, featuring Majors seemingly admitting to strangling his ex-girlfriend, Grace Jabbari, during the March 2023 altercation that led to his December 2023 conviction for misdemeanor assault and harassment.

This bombshell, first reported by El Cultural and Bleeding Fool, flips his previous courtroom stance on its head—yet, Majors is still actively pitching a return to Marvel Studios. In a March 18, 2025 interview, Majors told USA Today:

“Yeah, of course I say yes. Disney, Marvel Studios, I love them.”

It’s a bold move, considering his legal baggage and Marvel’s pivot away from Kang after his firing. Can this embattled actor claw his way back into Hollywood’s good graces, or has this latest scandal buried his career for good?

The Leaked Audio: Majors’ Own Words May End Him

Also on March 18, 2025, El Cultural dropped a shocking audio leak allegedly capturing Majors confessing to his 2023 assault on Grace Jabbari. In the clip, Majors can be heard saying:

“I’ve never [been] aggressive with a woman before. I’ve never aggressed a woman—I aggressed you.”

That’s not exactly the defense he gave in court.

During his 2023 trial, Majors denied all charges, yet a guilty verdict landed him a 52-week domestic violence intervention program in April 2024 instead of jail time.

This audio leak throws gasoline on a fire Marvel was trying to put out. Bleeding Fool described the recording as potentially “derailing any Hollywood comeback.” Meanwhile, fans who believed his innocence now have serious doubts—and the backlash is growing fast.

Can Kang Still Conquer the MCU? Majors Thinks So.

Despite all this, Majors hasn’t given up on Kang. His MCU journey started with his debut as He Who Remains in Loki Season 1, followed by Kang the Conqueror in Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania and Victor Timely in Loki Season 2. He was supposed to be the centerpiece of Avengers: The Kang Dynasty—until Marvel fired him after his conviction.

Now, that movie is Avengers: Doomsday, and the spotlight is shifting to Robert Downey Jr.’s Doctor Doom as Marvel rewrites its multiversal plans.

But Majors won’t let it go. In his Deadline interview, he doubled down on wanting back in:

“Yeah, of course I say yes. Disney, Marvel Studios, I love them.”

This isn’t the first time he’s expressed this sentiment. Back in July 2024, ScreenRant, IGN, and IndieWire reported that he told TMZ:

“I love Kang. I love him. I’m willing to do whatever it takes to come back if that’s what the fans want.”

A March 19, 2025, X post from @The_Epic_Scenes resurfaced the interview, showing he still believes he has a shot.

But does he? Marvel hasn’t officially announced Kang’s recasting—but this new audio might make that decision for them.

Hollywood’s Redemption Game: Can Majors Pull an RDJ?

Majors’ case isn’t unique in Hollywood, but it’s far messier than most redemption arcs.

Some actors—like Robert Downey Jr.—have bounced back from legal trouble (in RDJ’s case, drugs and arrests) to reclaim Hollywood’s biggest roles. But Majors isn’t dealing with substance abuse—he’s dealing with an assault conviction and now, a recorded confession.

The Fan War on X: #BringBackKang vs. #NoMajorsMCU

Social media is at war over Majors.

• #BringBackKang hit 500,000 mentions in March 2025, with fans praising his talent and pushing for his MCU return.

• #NoMajorsMCU is trending at 300,000 mentions, with people arguing that his legal issues should keep him out permanently.

• Meanwhile, #JusticeForGrace has amassed 200,000 mentions, driven by domestic violence survivors and their supporters.

Hollywood’s redemption clock is ticking, but this new leak isn’t helping Majors’ case.

The Career Fallout: What’s Next for Majors?

The leaked audio could be the final nail in Majors’ Hollywood coffin—or just another bump in the road.

• El Cultural called the recording “chilling” and noted that it completely contradicts his trial defense.

• Bleeding Fool warned that this leak “could end any chance of an MCU return.”

• His Magazine Dreams comeback film, once seen as a potential Oscar vehicle, now has a PR disaster to clean up.

Despite completing his court-mandated intervention program in early 2025, this leak isn’t letting him move forward.

What’s Next for Marvel?

Marvel’s silence on Majors, per Deadline, suggests they’re keeping their distance.

• Avengers: Doomsday is moving forward without Kang, focusing on Doctor Doom instead.

• X discussions on potential Kang recasts include actors like John David Washington, per IGN.

Majors still wants back in, but will Marvel take the risk?

Can Majors Survive This?

The March 2025 audio leak is his biggest career test yet.

If Magazine Dreams bombs, and Marvel officially moves on, his future in Hollywood looks bleak. But if audiences forgive him? That could change everything.

For now, his Kang dream is fading fast—and unless he somehow turns public opinion around, it may never come back.

Weigh In: Should Majors Return as Kang?

Do you think Jonathan Majors deserves another shot as Kang, or should Marvel lock the door on his MCU future? Does this leaked audio change your mind, or does his talent outweigh the scandal?

Drop your thoughts below or ping us on X @DREZZEDNews—I’m here to deliver the facts and hear your unfiltered take on Majors’ wild ride.

News compiled by Derek Gibbs and Edgar B.

D/REZZED Gaming News is part of Clownfish TV. Subscribe to our newsletter —

D/REZZED Gaming News

Pixels, Pop Culture, and the Paranormal! We’re an independent, opinionated entertainment news site covering Video Games, Tech, Comics, Movies, Anime, High Strangeness, and more. We strive to be balanced, based, and apolitical. Part of Clownfish TV.

By Clownfish TV Staff

.

D/REZZED provides balanced and based gaming, pop culture, and paranormal news. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of hosts, editors, other contributors, affiliates, sponsors, or advertisers. Our articles are human-edited but may utilize AI assistance for research and grammar. Articles may include affiliate links; we may earn commissions on purchases made through these links. Any products or services received for review are disclosed, as are any sponsored posts.

Lollapalooza isn’t just still around—it’s bigger than ever. The iconic festival returns to Chicago’s Grant Park from July 31 to August 3, and this year’s lineup is stacked:

• Olivia Rodrigo (pop-punk queen)

• Tyler, The Creator (hip-hop visionary)

• Sabrina Carpenter (pop sensation)

• RÜFÜS DU SOL (electronic beats)

• Luke Combs (country heavyweight)

• TWICE (K-pop royalty)

• A$AP Rocky (rap powerhouse)

• Korn (metal legends)

Throw in Gracie Abrams and Doechii for extra heat, and you’ve got a festival playlist so diverse it could cause whiplash.

The March 18 lineup announcement on Lollapalooza’s website and X (@lollapalooza) set the internet ablaze, proving this festival—once synonymous with the ‘90s alt-rock scene—still thrives in 2025. But what made Lolla such a cultural force in the first place, and why does it still dominate while other fests fade?

Let’s rewind to the MTV generation, break down the 2025 lineup, and see why this festival refuses to die.

Lollapalooza: A ‘90s Baby That Never Grew Old

Back in 1991, Jane’s Addiction frontman Perry Farrell dreamed up Lollapalooza as a farewell tour for his band. What started as a traveling alt-rock circus featuring Nine Inch Nails, Pearl Jam, and Soundgarden quickly became a counterculture icon.

By the mid-‘90s, Lolla was THE festival—a chaotic mix of grunge, punk, hip-hop, and skate culture. If you weren’t crowd-surfing to Smashing Pumpkins or watching Beastie Boys destroy a stage, were you even alive?

Then came the early 2000s crash. The tour stopped, rock lost ground to pop, and Lollapalooza nearly faded into history. But in 2005, it was reborn as a Chicago-based mega-festival, evolving to embrace pop, rap, EDM, and even country—all without losing its edge.

Fast forward to 2025, and Lolla is now a four-day, 170+ artist juggernaut. But does it still hold up against Coachella, Bonnaroo, and Austin City Limits?

The 2025 Lineup: A Genre-Blending Spectacle

Love pop? Olivia Rodrigo and Sabrina Carpenter have you covered.
Prefer rap? A$AP Rocky and Tyler, The Creator are delivering heat.
Feeling metal nostalgia? Korn’s here to wake up your inner headbanger.
Electronic vibes? RÜFÜS DU SOL is locked in.
Country? Luke Combs is bringing the twang.
K-pop? TWICE will have fans screaming in every language.

With over 170 acts spanning every genre, the 2025 lineup isn’t just a who’s who of Gen Z favorites—it’s proof that Lollapalooza still understands how to evolve while staying true to its roots.

It’s also a scheduling nightmare. Have fun picking between Olivia Rodrigo and TWICE if they play at the same time.

Ticket Smackdown: How to Secure a Spot

Tickets go on sale tomorrow, March 20, at 10:00 AM CT—and if you snooze, you lose.

💥 Presale:

• The cheapest 4-day passes are available for one hour only (until 11:00 AM CT).

• After that? Prices jump—so be fast.

💳 How to Buy:

• Sign up at www.lollapalooza.com for a presale passcode.

• Only U.S. phone numbers & emails qualify for early access.

🎟️ Ticket Tiers (Estimated Prices Based on Previous Years):

• GA (4-day): ~$350 (includes festival access)

• GA+: Adds lounge areas & private restrooms

• VIP: Better views, VIP lounges, upgraded restrooms, and golf cart rides

• Platinum: Front-row access, unlimited drinks, and all-day dining

🔹 Single-day passes? Likely dropping later when the day-by-day schedule is out.

💰 Pro Tip: Buy from Lollapalooza’s official site to avoid scams. Also, the first 1,000 U.S. buyers who use PayPal get $25 back (18+, terms apply).

Beyond the Music: What Lollapalooza 2025 Offers

Lolla isn’t just music—it’s an immersive experience.

🎨 Art Installations – Interactive pop-ups, Instagram traps, and live graffiti art.
🍔 Chow Town – Chicago’s top food trucks serving everything from deep-dish pizza to vegan tacos.
👶 Kidzapalooza – A kid-friendly music area (because even toddlers deserve a mosh pit).
💎 VIP Lounges – For those willing to drop cash on private bars, air-conditioned spaces, and actual seating.

This isn’t just a festival—it’s a four-day pop culture event.

Official Aftershows: The Real Party Starts at Night

Lolla doesn’t end at Grant Park. Expect official aftershows across Chicago at legendary venues like:

• The Metro

• House of Blues

• Lincoln Hall

🚨 Pro Tip: Aftershow tickets vanish FAST—watch Lolla’s official site & socials for announcements.

How Lollapalooza Stacks Up Against Other Fests

Lolla isn’t the only festival in the game. Here’s how it compares:

• Coachella (April 2025, CA): Bigger influencers, more desert dust.

• Bonnaroo (June 2025, TN): Hippie vibes, camping required.

• Austin City Limits (Oct 2025, TX): Smaller lineup, Texas heat.

Lolla still wins on location (Chicago rules), genre diversity, and historic credibility.

Why Lollapalooza Still Matters

34 years later, Lollapalooza is still one of the biggest festivals in America.

It’s survived music industry shifts, ticket price hikes, and generational changes—and 2025’s lineup proves it’s still evolving.

• Olivia Rodrigo’s pop-punk? Feels like a throwback to Lolla’s ‘90s roots.

• Korn on the bill? A nod to the festival’s alt-rock past.

• TWICE? Proof Lolla stays ahead of trends.

Chicago’s urban energy gives Lollapalooza an edge over every other U.S. festival—it’s a stadium-sized spectacle with street-level grit.

Weigh In: Are You Heading to Lolla 2025?

Will you snag a GA pass for Olivia Rodrigo, or skip the madness for another fest?

Does Lollapalooza’s Chicago grit beat Coachella’s desert glam?

Drop your thoughts below or ping us on X @DREZZEDNews—I’m here to deliver the facts and hear your unfiltered take on Lolla 2025’s stacked lineup.

News compiled by Derek Gibbs and Edgar B.
D/REZZED Gaming News is part of Clownfish TV. Subscribe to our newsletter at

D/REZZED Gaming News

Pixels, Pop Culture, and the Paranormal! We’re an independent, opinionated entertainment news site covering Video Games, Tech, Comics, Movies, Anime, High Strangeness, and more. We strive to be balanced, based, and apolitical. Part of Clownfish TV.

By Clownfish TV Staff